I just have one question--

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

Too much pastel?

[CaliforniaPeggy]

1. My dear Prisoner_Number_Six!

Wow! That's bright!

Nah...not too much pastel...

I like it!

Is it new?

And does it have a title?


:hug:


On edit: Did you see my poem?

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

3. New, untitled.

I rarely give my fractals names any more- I don't want to impose my vision on something that you may see differently. It's like the Rorschach test- it means exactly what the viewer WANTS it to mean, and nothing more.

I did read your poem, but in passing- I didn't have time to reflect and reply. I will a little later this evening.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

5. I'd never seen titles as imposing a vision...

But I understand, and I respect your stand on this.

I look forward to your later comments...

[Dr Morbius]

2. Not at all. You make the most interesting pictures, #6. (nt)

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

4. Thanks.

I try.

[MiddleFingerMom]

6. FUNNY...

.
.
.
...my very first thought was, "If that's a Rorschach test... I believe I just flunked it."
.
.
.
So to speak.
.
.
.
I almost feel... not violated... but... PRURIENTED.
.
.
.
I may not know art, but I know what I'd like.
.

[Prisoner_Number_Six]

7. Ya see, CaliforniaPeggy--

THIS is why I stopped naming 'em...

:rofl:

...Ya really should meet art. He's cool... :evilgrin:

[MiddleFingerMom]

8. I don't think I EVER had an untitled poem...

.
...as I always thought of the title as an integral part
of the poem.
.
I might sometimes tell people what may have inspired a
poem, but I ALWAYS refused to interpret a poem -- usually
glibly. I would say, "I've DONE my part -- now it's YOUR
job."
.
Quite often folks would tell me what it meant and it would
have absolutely nothing to do with MY intent -- yet their
interpretation was virtually always valid and gave ME a
new and interesting perspective about what I'd written --
often they pointed out what my sub-/unconscious had done
that I might not have noticed otherwise.
.