HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 02:31 PM
Original message |
Airport patdowns require mass rebellion - but there's a simple way... |
|
Act totally compliant but as soon as a hand gets ANYWHERE near the naughty bits, in a loud voice say, "HEY, WATCH where you PUT those hands. I'm MARRIED, damn it!"
You don't actually have to be married to use this line, but if enough people do it AND refuse the Hustler Magazine screening devices, maybe they'll get the hint eventually.
|
Phentex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
what if I enjoy it?
:evilgrin:
|
some guy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. then let 'em know that. |
|
see Meg Ryan fake orgasm in whatever-film-that-was for hints and tips.
:)
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. "When Harry Met Sally", wasn't it? |
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. "I,ll have what shes' having"!! |
MrScorpio
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Not quite. I was looking forward to getting a FREE handjob at the airport!! |
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Even simpler don't fly - |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-29-10 08:03 PM by stray cat
I personally am not crazy about explosives or armed passengers on planes that I am in but for those who like them please find your own planes
|
kayakjohnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
krispos42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-29-10 09:27 PM by krispos42
|
Iggo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-29-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
10. 'Last person who touched me there got a double-sawbuck.' |
Countdown_3_2_1
(778 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message |
11. They're selling this all wrong |
|
Let a trio of bikini gals pat me down, and then I get to pat them down... Security concerns would be met, and I would fly as often as possible!
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. They might add a "handling fee" for that service. |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. because the suggestion of violating young women/girls... is just "fun" for men. nt |
GoneOffShore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Or smile and do a forward hip thrust. |
|
And a "Hi, there big boy".
Guarantee they'll change screeners.
Also DO NOT opt for a private "pat down" - "No, I want everyone to see my civil liberties violated."
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Okay, that reminded me of a scene from "Blazing Saddles" |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMK6lzmSk2oNo offense to GLBT members, but that's just part of the offensiveness the ENTIRE movie was based on. If there was a way to offend someone, Mel Brooks tried to do so.
|
rrneck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
Curmudgeoness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. I like your last suggestion. Make them do the private pat down in public. |
|
And saying that you want everyone to see your civil liberties being violated is great. I do so much to stay under the radar when I fly, I do not want any problems, I do not want to be singled out, because I worry that I will never get on my plane---but to some federal prison---if they start to abuse me. But...this is so good that I might be inclined to do this myself.
|
zen_bohemian
(298 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-10 12:00 AM
Response to Original message |
18. well, if the screening people were tall, muscular guys named Thor |
|
that may not be too bad then :)
|
LibDemAlways
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Who knew that TSA stands for |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-31-10 12:36 AM by LibDemAlways
TitS & Ass? This latest outrageous ploy on the part of the idiots who run the useless POS agency ought to be met with outrage. If the public simply refused to fly until the powers that be instituted something resembling "smart" security, things would change in a hurry. People in large numbers have the power. How bad does it have to get before they decide to exercise it?
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-10 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. How bad does it have to get ... cavity searches? |
|
i thought strip search would do it, per the scanners, but nope, that didnt.
|
LibDemAlways
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-31-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Americans seemingly will put up with anything. You'd think the |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-31-10 01:20 AM by LibDemAlways
prospect of being irradiated would surely have made a difference, but so far, no luck. The latest directive allows them to touch grandma's crotch through her clothing. I'm hoping that will generate a few outcries here and there, but you're right. I think it will take full on body cavity searches before the public finally has enough and refuses to fly. Only then will the airline industry step in and put pressure on the government to restore sanity at security checkpoints. As always, $$ will talk.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |