Question.

[RandomThoughts]

How do people talk about comments I post, within the time frame that I post them, but do not reply here to posts, nor properly explain the concepts that are simple that could do much good like 'label trap' on the news or other media outlets?

Or why do they acknowledge that some of it has value, by some usage of that thought, but not also do what would seem proper when using some other set of work. It is obvious they should have corrected the wrong done years ago to me, it is obvious I was in the right, and obvious that proper compensation for that would be just. They can not admit the world can be just.


Answer, there must either be many people having the same ideas, or a secondary tier of society that does not discuss with the public ideas that they do not like, yet will use parts of them without attribution by with holding the posting of the development of the thoughts. The cumulative posts and how they fit together and the simple ideas used against society like label trap and manipulation of information.

Knowing there must be a second tier, then the next question is what group are they part of. They have to be part of media, they have to be part of politics, they have to be people posting here, and also be people that are in various political and economic groups.


Yet either they have not read the information and got it at the same time, doubtful by test, or someone uses the information for a different purpose, or existence is a different state, or they are criminal without any care.

It keeps adding up the same. If you do not agree to be criminal without any moral thought, then you are not recognized by a certain group. Why I said that I would not accept there concept of favor on the argument that it does not come from the good side, because they require you to be criminal without morals to receive their favor.

It is so simple, it shows those of much monetary or social status, if they see these posts, or a filter between them and these post, are criminal without justification or right. Yet they say if you are like them then you have divine favor, and only they can decide on that favor.

That shows what they follow, there thought of divine is based on what most think is wrong. there view of divine includes deception, theft, lack of justice, lack of care, hate, contempt for authority, and disregard of concepts of law.

Yet they know that, there goal is for other people to not know it, why they try to repress someone posting something like these posts.

From that it is highly likely that thousands of people post and talk as I do, and billions know it and do not talk about it. and then some group of some size tries to censor that for their own benefit or fears.

Really fascinating stuff.


Side note, by the posts it seems some of the suggestions I posted are said by posts to actually be being done. I find that odd and yet good, and do not have any ill will towards those that also do what they can with what they have, or use what they have to help many.

There are some that I have issue with though.

[RandomThoughts]

1. That makes sense.

"they take advantage of my posting, to do what I can not do, so I don't have to feel hurt."


That is the concept that the truly righteous are evil and violent, since they do what others will not so they don't have to feel bad about it.

It is the concept that to do evil, is the better since the person is doing the 'hard things' that must be done, and suffers the hurt from that. Although they really don't feel it, since they burn out their conscious to be able to think that way.

So noble they think being evil is, so that many in the world can live in bliss with ignorance and pleasant thoughts. They believe themselves giving their very sacrifice of feeling so that others don't have to be sadistic.


Heard that doctrine before.


If they were not that way, nobody would have to be. It is a delusion, I refused it because it does not make sense, not because I am not capable of that thought. Although with conscious and feeling.

If it really was true that they did the great evil to spare other people, would the really be condescending of those they are sparing from having to do the evil they sacrifice there conscious to do.

If they had an argument they would also be able to correct the injustice of beer and travel money. But they can't because it is not 'doing evil' to spare people, but until all people do evil.


And if they really had any nobility of sacrifice they would keep their conscious and not burn it out, since that is not a sacrifice if you do not feel others pain. I should let you know, those most compassionate do the toughest work, and that is not making rationals for injustice and evil.

The saddest part, without feeling, they don't even know what it is like.

I wont post that stuff to spare you from such thoughts. I will however share what I can find that has many better thoughts in it.