Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just saw on tv, they are talking about that guy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 04:47 PM
Original message
Just saw on tv, they are talking about that guy.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 04:49 PM by RandomThoughts
Ratigan just asked could anything have stopped him.

Ratigan said the guy thought the government was using mind control and Grammar to control people.


If someone explained to him that it was spiritual forces, then he would not have gone around and shot people.



He was in label trap, and was probably hearing spiritual voices. It is what happens when people don't know about the spiritual, and get hit by it.


A conversation on his concerns, could have shown him it was supernatural, once he knows that, then he would not go around shooting people.

What did people do, tell him he was crazy, when he knew he was not seeing things that were only part of his thinking.


An example, there is a trap to try and get people to think the groups are making up all the name correlations, and many other correlations. Correlations on 1000s of things. If I thought that, I could get mad at people that are not doing those things. And then if I thought that, I could fight people that are not causing the problem that would be from an attempt at a spiritual delusion. If you know it is spiritual, you can find the way out of those traps.

There are groups that use marketing, but he was seeing was not marketing. He was seeing what some have called a 'Grammaton Cleric'



Side note, I am still due beer and travel money.

Side note, saw the speech where Sara said her comments were not about violence, if that was played more it would have helped. Every time you say something is about violence by some interpretation, you do the same thing. If Sara did not think it was about violence, then a bunch of people said it was, they are loading the violence into it not her. I make that mistake sometimes also, but try to point out the good stuff in many places, by reminding, it is not about the violence, even if there are some violence blockers in the way you see something, or the way someone put it together.

just wanted to post this.

(Side note, the guy on a few news channels saying he knew that guy in school, was not being honest in his statements, most likely prompted to add a few comments into his interviews.)








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC