jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-23-11 10:50 PM
Original message |
I wanted it to be Jets-Seahawks for one reason |
|
I wanted the first Super Bowl in Jerry Jones' new brazillion-dollar monstrosity to be so fucking bad the Fox Sports people would apologize for cutting away from the beer commercials to show football.
|
KamaAina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Chiefs-Seahawks would have been worse |
|
The Jets are actually pretty good -- when they show up, unlike in the first half yesterday. :eyes:
|
Missy Vixen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. We still managed to beat the Saints |
|
I look forward to randomly bashing your teams at my earliest convenience.
:eyes:
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. As a lifelong die-hard Chiefs fan, let me just say |
|
That I don't know anything about professional football.
|
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
2. To me, this matchup is actually the sweetest, and not just because I'm |
|
a Packer fan. To have the 70's Super Bowl rival Steelers play in Dallas' new stadium? Against the 90's conference championship rival Packers? Sweetness!
|
Massacure
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Packers-Jets would have been sweet too. |
|
Both teams that Favre played for! :D
|
Initech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I'm glad the Packers were able to do it without the penis text-messenger. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |