jdp349
(372 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-16-11 12:21 PM
Original message |
We as a society need to come together and define the 1 to 10 scale |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 12:23 PM by jdp349
The 1 to 10 scale sucks as a tool because there are so many ambiguous interpretations of what the number mean. When someone asks me to rate my computer skills on a scale of 1 to 10 it's impossible for that to mean anything unless what each number means.
The way I see it is that since 5.5 is the average of the sum of set of 1 through 10 then a 5 or 6 means roughly average, average being dependent on the group you're considering the average of. The average computer skills the developers over at Google would be a 10 compared to the entire population, but there is a spectrum of computer skill competency at google which could be measured with the 1 to 10 scale. But this interpretation doesn't seem to be how other people see it, most apply the standard American grading ranges ie a 5 is an E/F meaning you suck, a 6 is a D which means you still suck but just a little less, 7 means below average even though a C is supposed to be average, 8 is average, 9 is good and 10 is outstanding.
This whole topic is stupid, I'm angry that my anger about this makes me angry enough to start a thread about this..
Bottom line is that the 1 to 10 scale is stupid and that it's probably your fault.
:rant:
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-16-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This rant is about a 2...3 tops |
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-16-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. on a scale of 1 - 10, I assume? |
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-16-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This thread reminds me of just how much I love grits. |
|
Most people only like grits. But me, I love 'em.
|
RandomThoughts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-16-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think what that means is 11 squared times 10
Does that help?
(11^2)*10
|
Doc_Technical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
5. You mean I'm not the only one who thinks this way, |
|
trying to put a logical template over vain attempts to measure human behavior?
Another example in the category of:
"You know this isn't a good path but you're going to go down it anyway."
|
MiddleFingerMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-17-11 01:26 AM
Response to Original message |
6. My sentiments EXACTLY!!! |
|
. . . Personally, I'm much more comfortable with a 0-to-53 scale. . . . . . . . . . . . 0 being "total fuck-all"... . . . . . . . . . . ...and 53 being "approaching MiddleFingerMomhoodnessosity". . . .
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |