Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Atlas Shrugged review

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 11:48 PM
Original message
My Atlas Shrugged review
Last week I admitted I went to "Atlas Shrugged Part 1" to get information to write a review of it. Well...here it is.

I saw Atlas Shrugged so you don’t have to

Ayn Rand was a Russian-born Atheist. She’s considered one of the founders of Libertarianism, which she called “Objectivism.” According to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, Objectivism’s heart is “the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.”

If anyone can figure out what the heck that means, please tell me.

Rand made her living writing exceptionally bad books. In 1957, she released her magnum opus, a tome entitled Atlas Shrugged. At 1368 pages it resembles a wheel chock more than it does a novel, and is best used as one. Atlas Shrugged is to the far right what Karl Marx’ Das Kapital supposedly is to the loony left, except that people willingly read Atlas Shrugged while any American who has endured Marx’s nearly-as-unreadable manifesto is either a political science major or a spy.

The central theme of Atlas Shrugged is: the only people who matter are the rich. If we don’t let them do whatever they want they will disappear and the world will collapse. That’s a cute theory but it’s bull; most of us can name at least one ex-boss whose greatest contribution to the company would have been vanishing in the middle of the night.

The reality of Atlas Shrugged Part 1 and Final—they’re more likely to make a Howard the Duck sequel than another installment of the planned Atlas Shrugged trilogy—is it’s not possible to express how bad this movie is. It fails on every level. It’s not even in focus! The lighting is so bad you can’t see half of anything, which may explain why the guy couldn’t focus the camera. The cast reminds me of Cheech’s band in Things Are Tough All Over: “the heaviest dudes in town who would work for nothing” and in clothes out of their own closets. They can’t act, and it’s not like they have to: all they’re doing is standing or sitting and reciting the worst script ever written. They spent $10 million making this…and it shows. Let’s put it this way: You’ve seen The Producers, right? Or at least heard of it? The movie (which became a Broadway play and then a movie again) about the failing Broadway producer who contrived an elaborate confidence scheme around the worst play ever written, which turned out to be a huge hit and landed everyone involved in jail? If Max Bialystock would have bought Atlas Shrugged instead of Springtime for Hitler, he wouldn’t have gone on to do Prisoners of Love.

Everyone in this movie drinks like a fish. They did not, however, save any for you—which you will regret about two minutes into this atrocity.

The world of Atlas Shrugged is one of obscenity: you are either so obscenely rich you spend two hours dressing and grooming before drinking in your own living room, or so obscenely poor waitresses ask first if you’ve got any money. For some strange reason, the poor don’t kidnap the rich.

In this world where five percent live in splendor and the rest in cardboard boxes, you will find two far-fetched yarns. One is the tale of John Galt. He invented a perpetual motion machine, got ripped off by his company, disappeared in the middle of the night and now spends his days convincing the people who screwed everything up in the first place to live in his commune. You’ll learn all about this in Parts 2 and 3 if they can find another rich right-winger who’s really desperate for tax loss. (This particular abomination was bankrolled by John Aglialolo, who makes his coin producing Cybex gym equipment.)

The other story concerns Taggart Transcontinental, the mightiest railroad in America. I have read a lot of reviews of this God-awful film that describe Dagny Taggart (Taylor Schilling, whose last movie was so bad it never made it to video, a fate that didn’t befall Snakes on a Plane) as a “railroad executive struggling to save her company against unforeseen forces.” Wrong. The reality is, the Taggarts haven’t put any money back into the company since Great Grandpa Taggart, who founded the place, died a century ago and now the company—especially the trackage—is falling apart. When their most important customer bails on them because Taggart trains derail daily, Dagny stages a coup then decides to close their most profitable yet most decrepit route for a year and replace the rails with ones made of a supermetal called “Rearden Metal.” It’s rustproof, strong, light, cheap and completely untested, but Dagny’s determination to use it is as strong as her will to not waste money on profit-sapping exercises like putting one guy and a sack of bolts in a pickup and sending him out to screw the tracks back together. Most of the rest of the movie is a montage of government and steel-industry people conspiring to rid the world of Rearden Metal, stock devaluations caused by Dagny’s insistence on Rearden Metal rails over maintenance, and other detachments from reality.

The movie is heavily anti-government and anti-union in ways that make no sense whatsoever, such as the scene where the union rep comes to Dagny’s office to tell her forcing railroad men to run trains over Rearden Metal track violates their human rights. Apparently forcing railroad men to run trains over century-old track that derails half the trains on it does not violate their human rights.

I gotta mention the obviously-CGI Rearden Metal bridge Dagny ordered to replace one Great Grandpa built all by himself that’s about ready to fall down. It’s beautiful—but it’s a mile long with no supports in the middle. The movie is full of people complaining that Rearden Metal’s no good; they’d have justification if this bridge had been built for real because it would have collapsed on its first use.

People are going to be of mixed minds on Atlas Shrugged Part 1 and Final: half of them are going to hate it, the rest will despise it with every fiber of their being. No one could like it. Don’t go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent review
Edited on Mon Apr-25-11 09:50 AM by geardaddy
I actually considered watching it so I could annoy the teabaggers and laugh at opportune moments.

edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Must . . . wait . . . for . . . schlockfest . . . to . . . come . . . out . . . on . . . video
Oh God, this travestly just SCREAMS to be seen! Aficionados of truly bad cinema will mine Atlas Shrugged for decades for laughs. I do not wish to contribute to its box office numbers, but it may be that the only way it should be seen is on the big screen. Lord, give me strength and wisdom to decide properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And you'll have to wait, because...
...curiously enough, this is the one theatrically-released film I've ever seen that hasn't managed to land on BitTorrent within a week of its release. Maybe the movie pirates shrugged, too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Either the pirates shrugged, or . . .
Their video cams kept throwing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Don't pay full price
But yes, the only way you are going to experience the complete majesty of this movie is to watch it in a theatre. I didn't believe it was possible to see intelligence being sucked out of human beings, but while watching this piece of shit I could just see the smarts being sucked out of people's heads and drawn into the screen, never to be seen again.

Call it the Fourth Law of Thermodynamics: any brain matter that gets sucked out of your head by Atlas Shrugged can never be recovered or used for anything again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
siligut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. How was the audience?
How many other people? General age? Curiosity seekers or true believers? Your review is entertaining/clever and seems to agree with the critics, the movie is crap. However, read the message board on IMDB and they tell a different story.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480239/board/flat/181675730?p=1

Get a laugh out of the liberal-progressives here

Have never read Rand, will never see this movie, but it is quite fun to read the anger of the liberal-progressives directed at anyone whom would even suggest that they own their body/mind, the labor of their body/mind and what it produces.

One would think you would not even have that much time to post on here with you being on your knees so much with your lips wrapped around Oduma's short black member.

And

Get a laugh out of the liberal-progressives on here by showing them the b.o. receipts for ASS and telling them "Look, it's a hit!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I left first, before the credits rolled...
and right after the "End Part 1" card went up...

(Before I start: there's a chain of fast food joints in the Inland Northwest called Zip's. It's been here forever and they're all over the place. One of their signature dishes is the "Papa Joe" which is a single hamburger with a slice of ham on it, and you can get two of them for $4.)

There are a LOT of conservatives in this area. There were very few people in this theatre--it was a 20-screen cineplex, they put it in the smallest theatre and it was MAYBE one-tenth full. Anyway, I watched the people as they left. Most of them seemed to be thinking, "I could have gotten two Papa Joes and change for that $5. Why didn't I?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookworm65t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. thanks for the review
If I had the choice between seeing this crap versus trying to read the damn waste of paper,it would be a tough call. I only read half the book, I just couldn't stomach any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Two word review: Atlas Shat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. My condolences for your time wasted watching this movie.
You will never get that back. On the other hand, you did a very entertaining review. So at least you got something out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC