Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should severely obese children be taken from parents?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:30 AM
Original message
Should severely obese children be taken from parents?
By Katherine Hobson


When parents are physically harming their kids, the state can step in and remove them from the home. Should that happen if a child is severely obese?

A commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Association says it should be considered, but only “in carefully selected situations.”

The two authors, Lindsey Murtagh of the Harvard School of Public Health and David S. Ludwig of Children’s Hospital Boston, say that in most cases, overweight and obese kids will have a chance to improve their health as adults. (About 16% of kids aged 10 to 16 were obese in 2007, according to government stats.)

But, they write, the health consequences for the most severely obese children –defined as a body mass index at or above the 99th percentile, which includes about 2 million kids — can be “immediate and potentially irreversible.” Mostly, they’re referring to type 2 diabetes, which can become permanent and set kids up for cardiovascular disease. One obesity treatment option, gastric bypass surgery, carries the risk of serious complications and its long-term effectiveness isn’t known, the authors write.

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2011/07/13/reader-consult-should-severely-obese-kids-be-taken-from-their-parents/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. No. In fact, hell no.
We're not a nanny state yet.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, this is an article for GD.
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That sounds like a straight route to a flamewar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiosmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Please don't send me to GD. I'll be good. Honest I will. PLEASE!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Depends on why they're obese.
If it's just a general lack of exercise, then no. We don't take kids away because simply because their parents suck.

If they're obese because their parents are abusive...and certain kinds of mental abuse certainly qualify, then they should absolutely be taken away. For example, people who scream at their kids because they don't eat every...single...bite, even though the kid is full, should probably have their kids taken away if the result of that verbal abuse is weight problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. So basically, no. Not simply for being obese.
But for being abused, as we already do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. I blame NCLB for this problem
Back when I was in school - we had 50 minutes of gym class twice a week. It was a requirement for every student. Eliminating the time you spend getting changed - you had about 35-40 of exercising twice a week, which for some kids might be the only exercise they get.

But because the "No Child Left Behind" act stresses doing well on these dumbass standardized testings - many schools eliminated gym in order to provide extra study time for the kids.

Personally I think NCLB should be dumped and instead bring back Gym Class although this time make it 3 times a week.

If kids could get 30 minutes 3 times a week - we would do serious impact into lowering the number of kids who are have childhood obsesity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
outerSanctum Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Abso-fuckin-lutely
This is as much child abuse as anything I can think of. If these lard ass parents want to keep shoving the twinkies in their own face, that's one thing. But, turning your kid into a giant tub of goo is horrible abuse that will follow him his/her entire life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC