SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-18-11 12:13 AM
Original message |
i am getting my first physical since |
|
hell who am i kidding i got one in 1978 and a cursory look over before a vasectomy in 1984 but other than that i havent seen a Dr since my physical for high school gym class. they took my blood and urine for testing hopefully not a taste test cause i grilled asparagus at work the night before and may have nibbled a little of it. is it coincindental that the closer the date gets the more things i notice not working as well as in the past? this is a routine exam my wife got the doctor to trick me into when he was fixing a footsprain. im too "old" to go around without a checkup i have no health issues that i know of.
|
Aristus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-18-11 12:20 AM
Response to Original message |
1. As a Physician Assistant, I have to say, candidly, that I think complete physical exams |
|
are a waste of time. Every single problem I have diagnosed a patient with has resulted from pretty much incidental findings. For example, when doing a cranial nerve check on a patient complaining of migraine headaches, I have noted in the eyes a sign called corneal arcus, or arcus senilus, which is a hallmark of high blood cholesterol.
Things like that.
Didn't take a complete, time-consuming, head-to-toe exam to arrive at that diagnosis.
On the other hand, for at-risk patients, I will, as part of a physical, order lab tests for cholesterol levels, which would have revealed the same condition. So it's a wash, I suppose...
|
SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-18-11 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. i knew there was a cholesterol test so |
|
i ate bacon at work all week....like studying was that right?
|
iris27
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-18-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Of course now that I'm looking I can't find it, but I swear I just came across a study |
|
that said the positive correlation btw physicals and better health is because people who are more likely to be health-conscious in general are the ones who are more likely to get a physical -- not from any general benefit of the physicals themselves.
Kinda like how we originally thought hormone replacement therapy lowered risk of heart disease, etc. -- because it was healthier women in general who were more interested in the possible benefits of HRT.
|
MiddleFingerMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-18-11 12:36 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I wonder what percentage of prostate problems are detected earlier... |
|
. . . ... because of general physicals? . . . I know men from 45-50 and up are advised to get annual or bi-annual prostate exams (if not more, um... in-DEPTH exams) depending on their at-risk factors... but how many of us would actually GET those checks if on an "a la carte" basis. . . . . . . . . I never DREAMED I'd use the terms "prostate exam" and "a la carte" in the same sentence. . . . Be still, my heart!!! . . .
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |