|
Edited on Thu Jul-07-05 02:02 AM by thegreatwildebeest
A great case in point was the anti war rallies I went to before the Iraq invasion. A large cluster of people who thought, rightly, that invading Iraq when bin Laden was still on the lam was insanity dressed up as policy. But when we got there, the open forum was distracted--hijacked really--by people who wanted to ban meat, people who wanted to end government, people who wanted to end private property, and of course the LaRouchers who always show up at public demos, like cockroaches drawn to leftovers. The rally showed our community that thousands of Houstonians thought this war was insane, but of course the local news mostly showed the fringies who didn't represent the soul of the rally.
Well I have my beef with the single issue ghettoization of liberal politics, the idea that its "the fringies" who don't "represent the soul" is patently ridiculous. I should know cause I am a "fringie" (anarchist). A solid core of anarchist activists have been involved in many, many protests on any number of issues, coordinating legal support, medical assistance on the streets, publicizing events, and setting up convergence spaces for protestors to meet, discuss, and work on art/puppets/etc for protests. I'm tired of getting grief from liberal Democrats on somehow hogging the limelight from them, when last time I checked, no anarchist has a a well funded political party, nor literally millions of dollars in liberal NGO's and other issue organizations. When any anarchist group starts shoving around millions of dollars than I'll start worrying about whether I'm clouding up someone elses message time. And the idea that I have to be in goose step with anyone on a message, particuarly people who significantly more moderate than I am, is ridiculous. The "Anybody But Bush" crowd didn't win this time, and never were going to, because as long as "Resistance" means lining up like drones to vote come every 2 years, well, I've got better things to do.
There's also a lack of totality in just arguing that this war sucks. It IS connected to a bajillion other issues, all wrapped up in one big government-political system. Arguing this war is wrong and giving a thumb up to the rest of the shebang is ignoring the numerous connections between the two. The war is the excrement of a much larger process.
Don't get me wrong; I want us to discuss all issues so that we can work together toward realizing what will improve us as a Republic and as a party. But I assumed that this Activist Corps group was not about dialog as much as it was about hitting the streets and licking the envelopes and firing off the faxes.
Hitting the streets is not quite on par with licking evelopes. Moreover, if by "hitting the streets" you mean "marching around in circles with signs", well, I doubt that will do any good either. When I heard that there was going to be a DU activist corp I was kind of amused to see where it would go, and what would it do. Would it be a forum to turn DU members into non-electoral organizers, doing direct action to solve and tackle issues, or would it be another vague "E-activist" situation. Unfortunatly it seems to be another vague "e-activist" thing consisting mostly of sending faxes and the like. I'll stick to my community gardening organizing, prison support work, etc.
|