Memekiller
(755 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 06:38 PM
Original message |
Clark a more loyal Democrat than Dean... |
|
Who would have thought Clark would prove to be more loyal to the Democratic party than Dean? Clark's allegiance may be recent, but at least you don't hear him insinuating his troops won't support the party if he's not the nominee.
Until now, I respected Howard Dean. I would be willing to support anyone who got the nomination. But if Dean is making veiled threats to bolt, I'm not sure I can support him.
|
polpilot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |
demsrule4life
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Two types of people I have real trouble in trusting |
|
a turncoat and a woman that cheated on her husband then wants to marry me.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
OrAnarch
(433 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 06:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Incorrect premise from the getgo.
|
Memekiller
(755 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
It seems to me Dean's ego and political career is more important to him than defeating Bush.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
Memekiller
(755 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Then he ought to stop... |
|
You say Clark's not a Democrat. Yet I haven't heard him make any noises about picking up his marbles and leaving if things don't go his way. He's willing to live by the process. Is Dean? Or is he merely "hinting" out of sheer political opportunism?
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. I never said Clark isn't a Democrat, that was another poster |
|
Dean never said he would "pick up his marbles and leave," that is the way you WANT to interpret what he said. And I find it is futile to keep repeating the same things over and over to people who have their own agendas. If you take the time to read Dean's speeches and listen to him speak you might learn something.
|
Memekiller
(755 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. If Dean reiterates his support to the party... |
|
...I withdraw everything I said. But right now it appears to be a winking threat, and I don't like blackmail.
But Dean's ahead. And if he shows the same willingness to throw his support behind whoever the Democratic nominee is, I'll surely throw my support behind him, if it comes to that. But this has certainly lowered him a peg or two in my eyes.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Dean has earnestly pleaded with his supporters to rally behind |
|
other Democrats in state races. I have received e-mails from his campaign asking for my support of candidates I'd never heard of, in other states. He also let it be known--LOUDLY--that said candidates were in no way beholden to him; i.e., they did not have to endorse him or anything in return, just that he wanted the people to rally behind DEMOCRATS. He is considering not only the presidency but also the all-important Congressional races as necessary for taking back our government. His own ego, as far as I can see (& I have been watching him since about March 2003), is just not involved. He is striving mightily and sincerely to bring the government back to the people.
|
Turkw
(521 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. Yes Wes is, and I'm glad for it, too |
|
All patriot, no act. No litmus test either
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 07:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Memekiller
(755 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 10:08 PM by Memekiller
... if you're more interested in forwarding your candidate than defeating Bush, welcome to another four years -- enjoy them. But I still have a problem with your candidate wanting Democrats to rally behind him, when he won't do the same if things don't go his way.
Yeah, yeah, he says he'll support the Dem out of one side of his mouth, then say his supporters are "non-transferrable" out of the other. It's the same tactic Bush uses -- saying he's seen no connection between Al Qaeda and Hussein to get his critics of his back, then mentioning the two together every chance he gets so the public makes the connection.
I just wish you Nader/Dean supporters would wake up and see that this election is the most important election in decades. It determines whether the neo-conservative vision solidifies its hold. It's about the country, not any one candidate -- and there is a difference between each and every one of the Democratic candidates and George W. Bush. A HUGE difference.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-29-03 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. he can't "make" his supporters do diddly-squat |
|
Dean is just saying that the new, young, punk, disassociated, uninvolved voters that he has recruited cannot be guaranteed to turn out for anyone else. He will of course advise them as strongly as possible to vote for the Democrat but how can he force them to do so? Can Clark guarantee that all of his supporters would vote for a different Democratic nominee? Dean is not "threatening," just making a comment that is not important enough to warrant all this hysteria. It is NOT an issue.
|
Memekiller
(755 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-30-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
It may be true, but the only reason to say it is to make people aware of the threat so they'll be badgered into voting for him.
|
ima_sinnic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-30-03 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. have you bothered to check the context? |
|
do you think he just said this out of the blue? I personally do not know the context and I don't care. I have confidence in Howard Dean. Probably some reporter asked him something. You should check the context before you go into a flap.
|
Beearewhyain
(291 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-30-03 01:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Dean said something political...Clark said something political...could they be... politicians? ;) The point is neither of them are totally beholden to the party, they will do what they think is in their best interest to secure the loyalty of their respective base. It is up to US to tell them what position to take, not the other way around.
|
He loved Big Brother
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-30-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Clark voted for Reagan and Bush the First |
|
Both really great Democrats.
Except for the "great" and "Democrats" part.
Sorry, Clark doesn't get my trust. And I doubt he will get my vote.
|
DianeK
(612 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-30-03 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
|
and i never really got the 'loyal to the party' thing..parties be damned, this is about bringing this country back to what it once was so that we can begin to move forward in the right direction...an awful lot of democrats have been content to roll over on this one which is why dean has my support..he actually has a spine and that is a good thing
|
polpilot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-30-03 11:08 AM
Response to Original message |
21. The Dean troops OPPOSE the losing demo mantras and have chosen |
|
to take the party away from repub-lite. The loyal losing demos' time has passed.
Dean '04...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |