Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can The Process That Determines Outcome In Florida And Michigan Be Hijacked? Nope.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:58 PM
Original message
Can The Process That Determines Outcome In Florida And Michigan Be Hijacked? Nope.
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/could_loser_of_popular_vote_co.php

Can The Process That Determines Outcome In Florida And Michigan Be Hijacked? Nope.
By Greg Sargent - February 19, 2008, 1:26PM



snip//

The process is convoluted, but in essence what happens is that each campaign gets to send a number of members to the credentials committee out of each state in a number that's proportional to the number of delegates he or she has in that state. This virtually ensures that the number of credentials committee members he or she seats out of each state is roughly proportional to the popular vote he or she won in that state.

“Membership is proportional to the vote in each state,” says DNC press secretary Stacie Paxton.

So, while it's remotely possible that, say, Hillary, should she lose the overall popular vote, would end up with more credentials committee members here and there, in states like California, it would be virtually impossible statistically for her to have more members than Obama does overall, let alone a majority.

One other side note: It's not even clear yet what scenarios the credentials committee will be considering. Once the voting is over, and the credentials committee is seated, it will meet publicly to consider a whole range of options for Michigan and Florida -- not just the scenario favored by the Hillary campaign, which is the seating of the delegations as determined by the votes in those states.

One proposal, for instance, that's being talked about is that the delegations are split 50-50 between the two candidates. But again, it's unclear what scenarios will ultimately be considered. In the end, the credentials committee itself has a great deal of discretion over what scenarios to vote on, and hence, over what will ultimately happen.

But in the end, the scenario that envisions Hillary losing the overall pledged del vote but having a majority of members of the credentials committee -- and thus determining what happens with Michigan and Florida -- is pretty much impossible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good to hear! Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC