Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton, Obama Recast Their Message on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:39 AM
Original message
Clinton, Obama Recast Their Message on Iraq
Clinton, Obama Recast Their Message on Iraq
As Voters Increasingly Focus on Economic Concerns, War Becomes a Proxy for Other Issues
By Peter Slevin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, March 3, 2008; A09

CORPUS CHRISTI, Tex. -- Five years into a deeply unpopular war in Iraq, one of the surest applause lines for a Democratic candidate has been a promise to bring home the troops. But as Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign in Texas and Ohio ahead of Tuesday's critical primaries, they are encountering an electorate that has largely moved on.

With the economy and health care now registering as voters' top concerns, the candidates have discovered that it is not enough simply to oppose a war that has cost the nation the lives of 3,963 soldiers and hundreds of billions of dollars. In a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, 9 percent of likely Democratic voters in Ohio ranked the war as the most pressing issue.

Instead, the candidates use the ongoing conflict to underscore a host of other issues, from national security and domestic spending to what it says about their own judgment. That point is driven home in the fierce exchange of recent television advertisements and campaign trail assertions in Texas and Ohio, states with strong connections to the military.

Obama (Ill.) points to his early opposition to the war as proof of his wisdom on foreign policy. Clinton cites her understanding of complex issues related to Iraq as a reason she would be best prepared to lead "on Day One." They use the war as a proxy to discuss national security, describing Iraq as an example of misguided foreign policy and failed counterterrorism strategy.

Obama and Clinton (N.Y.) also ask audiences to imagine what $120 billion -- the approximate annual cost of the conflict -- would buy. They contend that bringing the troops home would liberate cash for economic investment, infrastructure improvements and, Clinton argues, improved care for hundreds of thousands of war veterans and their families.

A combination of somewhat better news from the war zone and worsening economic prospects at home is pushing the candidates beyond the templates that guided their strategy when the campaign began....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/02/AR2008030202374_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC