Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean referred to as 'Ultimate panderer'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:03 PM
Original message
Dean referred to as 'Ultimate panderer'
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 01:03 PM by quinnox
An article from the Des Moines Register about a candidates forum in Iowa had this to say at the end:

Two other observations from Wednesday's event:

* Winners: Gephardt and Kerry. The two were forceful, informed and presidential- looking.

* Ultimate panderer: Dean. The former Vermont governor once referred to "us rural people" during his remarks. Right. (Born to a wealthy family in small-town New York City, Dean attended that one-room prep school, St. Georges in Rhode Island, before donning his manure-caked boots and heading to that great land-grant college, Yale.)

http://www.dmregister.com/opinion/stories/c5917686/22505808.html

I think that sums up Dean well - he is an expert in pandering. Although there are those that can see right through him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. He has lived in Vermont since 1978
and yes Vermont is rural. I take it that if I move to a city I am not entitled to say we urban people since I was born in a small town. Is that really your contention? If so, then what may I call myself in that case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogczar Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. as if
I think you must be thinking of how Kerry and Gephardt both "pandered" to Bush and Co. with the blank check they gave him to go to war.

Dean doesn't pander, Dean leads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The epitome of political pandering
Dean says:

"We have to stop terrorism before peace negotiations"
http://www.forward.com/issues/2002/02.11.22/news3.html




to a publication aimed at a Jewish audience, and

said he didn't "believe stopping the terror has to be a prerequisite for talking."
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/10/elec04.prez.dean.mideast/



to a general audience. No pandering here, folks, move along, nothing to see here...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What he won't tell you in his post
is that Israel changed its position on negotiations. While I don't think Israel's position should be dispositive it should certainly be considered. Maybe Kerry thinks that if Israel wishes to negotiate we should tell them they can't but I am glad Dean doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. What does that have to do the Dean's demonstrated pandering?
Dean said one thing to the Jewish audience of Forward, and then the exact opposite to a general audience. He needs to explain why. Did he change his mind because Israel changed it's position? (The wisdom of that is the subject of a whole other discussion, IMHO.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. So you think it is unwise
to let Israel decide to negotiate? I think that is nuts. And since you are making the charge the burden of proof is on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I think it is dishonest
to say one thing to one audience, something else to another.

And I think you are a little mixed up on whether or not the Sharon government is willing to negotiate with the PA by the way. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. they were negotiating
with that new PA primeminister well now he is the old PA prime minister but then he was new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. Kerry just stopped payment on that check
I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. Good one!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. Haha...hadn't thought of it that way.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think they were all pandering
but Dean saying "us rural folks" is referring to his current homestate, Vermont, which, like much of Iowa is predominately rural. David Yepsen is often very negative in his reporting on Dean, and apparently some Iowans here have said he is fairly conservative, so I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
56. he is
consistently negative on Dean. If he hasn't gotten emails, letters, etc yet, he will .. not that it will make him change his reporting .. anyone with an open mind can see through his slanted agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. DAMN ! .... I hate those who try to ....
gratuitously cast SHIT on our own candidates like this .....

Is this the BEST you can do ?? ....

CMON ! ......

and I thought the Clark haters were bad .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Huh?
So you don't like that a newspaper reporter cast Dean in a less than glowing light? I suggest you write or e-mail the website, and demand they remove this story immediately!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm rather unimpressed with you as well
as the reporter. Or are those comments in the lead post not yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The comments underneath the link
are mine, the comments above the link are from the story, which I agree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. then quit the mock protests when people
call you on your shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. You left out the part where Kerry got booed...
When he tried to attack Dean. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. answers
1. Yes it does
2. And the sun rises everyday too.
3. I know the drill, anytime criticism is leveled at Dean they must be a rightwinger.
4. You are completely wrong, and I look forward to voting in Kerry, Edwards or Gephardt in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. LOL!
The post makes voting for Dean look like a punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Let me get this straight
Because Dean considers himself a 'rural person' he is pandering? Exactly how long does someone have to live in a rural state before he/she is considered rural? Or is it the fact he hasn't worked on a farm or ranch? I grew up in rural Montana but I didn't work on a farm or ranch either. Does that mean I can't claim to be rural. How about the fact that I left Montana when I was 18 and only returned in the summers until I was 21. That means Dean has been in a rural state for 25 years and I was only there for roughly twenty. I still think I'm rural, why can't Dean?

Someone post the standards of what a rural person is, please, so I can fully understand just how egregiously Dean has pandered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. I know Yepsen
Yepsen is a Republican. I read the register (and live in Iowa) He writes about four-five times a week. He has been in favor of Dean getting the nomination but mostly because he didn't think he could win. He has also said that a candidate MUST get the elderly vote in Iowa because they reliably attend the caucuses--so republicans pander to tham to--e.g. "compassionate conservative."

I finally got the link to work and I appologize for my earlier angry post, but lets get the facts here. I am guessing the thread oringinator would be skeptical of Republican claims about his or her candidate, so I would hope that same courtesey would be extended here. And if not, consult Yepsen's other articles for harsh comments made about Kerry, Edwards, Gephardt, etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Isn't it amazing?
I'm absolutely amazed at the amount of time some people have to look for deliberately offensive news articles and headlines, rather than devoting time to posting something positive about THEIR candidate... maybe it's because they HAVE nothing positive to say abot him or her, do you think? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Tear Down the Front Runner
It is what they have to do. I don't begrudge them for doing it. Dean had to do it when he was unknown. He now only has to hit them once in awhile to keep them in place. The anti-Dean crowd are grasping at straws. I seriously don't know what they are trying to achieve.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. They're only demonstrating the weakness of their own positions.
What next, I wonder? "Hi Mommy dresses him funny?" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. I saw this forum on C-Span 2
I watched it with someone who is not overly enamored with Dean... he's actually leaning to Clark, likes Edwards alot too.
We were both VERY impressed with Deans performance.
Kerry, while not unimpressive... has a disturbing tendancy to very clumsily segway into the subject he WANTS to talk about.
Dean answers the questions... and in a way that makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. Are You Suggesting That Dean Would
Mention the black roommates he ordered for college as his race credentials? Speak Spanish at a New Mexico debate? Talk about his brother to establish his anti-Vietnam credentials? Use graffiti in uptown Manhattan (not up-uptown, of course) to establish his street cred? Drop the name of an obscure Wyclef Jean song to connect with the hip-hop nation?

Dean is above politics as usual.

"Then there was the Imageering 101 political staging, a subject of much snickering in the press pool. At most every stop Dean had a statistically accurate multicultural microcosm await his arrival on stage, usually against a background of a giant American flag. Milwaukee, the second stop on the tour, was the most painful: seventeen supporters of various races (in proper proportions: three blacks, two Hispanics, etc.), frozen and seemingly afraid to move or make a face against the backdrop of a mammoth Old Glory. Watching them wait for Dean gave me shivers; they looked like sausages nailed to a giant red, white and blue crucifix."

http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031006&c=5&s=taibbi

"But it was hard not to notice that all the people surrounding Dean were veterans of the same-old, same-old Democratic Party. Dean campaign manager Joe Trippi is a longtime Democratic political consultant who has worked on the campaigns of Edward Kennedy, Walter Mondale and Gary Hart, and in 1988 he even worked for current Dean opponent Dick Gephardt.

Trip coordinator Matt Vogel worked for Gore, as did Kelly McMahon, Dana Singiser, Aram Kailian, Patricia Enright (who was Gore's deputy director of communications) and numerous other Dean operatives appearing at one time or another on the Sleepless Summer Tour."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Gasp he hired experienced people
I just can't believe he did that. I, for one, never look for experienced people to fix my car, treat my illnesses, or if I had some invest my money. As to the rest, he mentioned his brother in one interview after being directly asked. I have literally never seen him brought up in any stump speech. I also fail to see what is wrong with having a representative audience and if I weren't used to a crown, as presumedly many of those people weren't, I would be nervous too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
54. "Representative Audience?"
That's one way to put it. "Cheap exploitation?" "Quota pandering?"

I'm sure Dean judged his phot ops by the content of their character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. I'll tell you what
what to bet that every single Democrat does the exact same thing. Wanna make book on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. Stupid Panderer.
The guy's a stupid draft-dodging pandering BUM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Have you got anything of value to add to this conversation?
just a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I'm glad you asked. The ex-governor ex-doctor ex-stockbroker is more...
... than a stupid panderer. He's a stooge for Wall Street. Need links?

Dean thinks hiding his records as governor is smart. He asked for them to be covered up for 20 years, but "settled" for 10, which is still four more than any other Vermont governor needed.

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/vpr/news/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=441887

Dean panders to whatever group he's speaking to. When he addressed Marian Wright Edelman, founder of the Children's Defense Fund, he said he didn't really mean it when he said:

"Liberals like Marian Wright Edelman are wrong."

http://www.progress.org/2003/sol125.htm

Want more? I'd be glad to oblige.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Oh Oh that it's
I'm done with Dean... ya got me Oh Oh...

perhaps his actions like here....
http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/PageServer?pagename=policy_record_education_children

in the name of children mean more to me than words.

at least he connects with his audience... unlike your candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #31
60. Thanks for pointing that out, indigo!
While I hadn't noticed, you do have a point. There are many posters on DU who, for their own good reasons, believe as you do. It may be that they don't like Kerry's Senatorial speaking style. "Whereas." "Notion." "Policy." Truth be told, I don't care for it much, either, on the stump. What I would recommend is Kerry talk about how he's gone after the BFEE. Unlike any other candidate, Sen. Kerry could say (quotes invented for examples only):

"I went after BCCI, a bank used by the world's drug-dealers, terrorists, money-launderers, and intelligence agencies to bribe elected officials around the world and here at home in America."

"I uncovered drug-dealers were using their connections to Ollie North and Vice President Bush to import cocaine and make money for an illegal war in Central America. For my trouble, the FBI investigated me — a sitting US Senator."

There are many more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. The Kerry Paradox:
1. The anti-BFEE candidate!!!

2. Trusted Chimp to do the right thing regarding the UN, coalition-building and Iraq. (Iow, what he claims his IWR vote was all about.)

3. Voted to grant unprecedented power to BFEE crony Ashcroft via the PA.


Square #1 with #2 and #3. That's the "Kerry Paradox."


Let me get this straight. Kerry is such a force of anti-BFEE crusading power that I should give him my vote. Yet weren't the IWR and PA two of the most powerful tools ever given to a POTUS*? Or is it part of his master plan to take them down by giving them MORE power? Face it. Kerry's anti-BFEE days ended in the 1980's, back when he was trying to make a name for himself. He's establishment all-the-way these days. Sometimes the truth hurts.

If that's exposing the BFEE, maybe we should have someone else do it. :shrug: This "anti-BFEE" crap is demonstrable bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Speaking of pandering...
In 1992, for example, Kerry announced he was going to launch an initiative on race, crime, and the problems of urban America. He gave the opening speech of a promised series at Yale University, warning about the costs of a "culture of dependency. . . . We must ask whether is the result of a massive shift in the psychology of our nation that some argue grew out of the excesses of the 1960s, a shift from self-reliance to indulgence and dependence, from caring to self-indulgence, from public accountability to public abdication and chaos," the former antiwar protester said.

(snip)

It was a daring speech for a liberal politician. To some, it appeared as if Kerry was genuflecting toward Little Rock, where Bill Clinton was running for president on a platform that included personal accountability, "ending welfare as we know it," and support for capital punishment -- and might need a northern Democrat to balance the ticket that November. After Clinton chose a fellow southerner, Senator Al Gore of Tennessee, as his running mate, Kerry quietly dropped the series of speeches he had promised to make on race relations.

http://www.boston.com/globe/nation/packages/kerry/062103_p.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. If I was advising him, I'd have recommended he make the speeches.
More than likely, Kerry had something more important to do. Let's see...1992... Oh yeah, he was fighting Ollie North-CIA-Iran-Contra drug smugglers, the FBI, corruption at the highest levels of government and business, and the Poppy Bush Justice Department and White House. Don't believe me, GOOGLE it.

Kerry's report, from the Federation of American Scientists website:

http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/

Slower download, but lots of info:

http://www.the-catbird-seat.net/BCCI.htm

For more advanced reading:

http://www.annenberg.nwu.edu/pubs/news/news03.htm


BTW: What was Ho-Ho doing then? I don't remember him standing up to government corruption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. I'd guess
he also didn't want to steal any thunder from the Presidential campaign underway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Sen. Kerry is a team player.
That's what makes the best skippers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of the word
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 05:04 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
'pandering'?

In what sense was not giving these speeches pandering?
On a related note, in another thread you characterize this as a lie.
Do you mean because he first announced plans to give a series of speeches, and then didn't give them, that his announcement was a lie?

I suppose you could characterize it that way. Let's compare it to a statement of Dean's that I have characterized as a lie:

"Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.): I've said many times that I think we should raise the retirement age about the year 2015—raise it by that time to about age 70.

"Howard Dean: I am very pleased to hear Bob Packwood because I absolutely agree we need to reduce the—I mean, to increase the retirement age. There will be cuts and losses of some benefits, but I believe that Sen. Packwood is on exactly the right track."
—CNN's Crossfire, Feb. 28, 1995
http://slate.msn.com/id/2086804/


Here we have Dean on the record as supporting raising the retirement age.

Russert: ...calling for that, and this is what Howard Dean said. “The way to balance the budget, Dean said, is for Congress to cut Social Security, move the retirement age to 70, cut defense, Medicare and veterans pensions, while the states cut almost everything else. ‘It would be tough but we could do it,’ he said.”
Dean: Well, we fortunately don’t have to do that now.
Russert: We have a $500 billion deficit.
Dean: But you don’t have to cut Social Security to do that.
Russert: But why did you have to do it back then?
Dean: Well, because that was the middle of—I mean, I don’t recall saying that, but I’m sure I did
--Meet the Press, June 22, 2003
http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/912159.asp


Here we have Dean being reminded, and acknowledging, on national TV on June 22 that he did hold this position.


"I have never favored Social Security retirement at the age of 70, nor do I favor one of 68."
—AFL-CIO Democratic presidential candidate forum, Aug. 5, 2003
http://slate.msn.com/id/2086804/


Here we have Dean denying on national TV on August 5 that he ever held that position.


So Kerry 'lied' when he announced a series of speeches and then didn't give them.

And Dean lied about whether or not he ever favored raising the retirement age.

The voters can decide which 'lie' is more relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Let go your hate.
Embrace the love!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. It's not hate. It's trust — As in "Whom I trust to be Chief Executive."
From what I've seen, read, heard, and responded to, Howard Dean is nowhere near my second choice. It's nothing personal against you, Professor, or any other Dean supporter, even those who insult my candidate. It has everything to do with who is qualified to solve the problems facing the United States and meet the new ones coming over the horizon.

No matter what, I appreciate what you said. Shanti.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
33. Wait - maybe he meant "ultimate" in the sense of "last"
Was Dean last to speak that day? :)

Maybe they were all pandering. Kerry might have been the "penultimate panderer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. just an opinion piece
I watched it on C-SPan and thought he rocked the house
but that was just my opinion ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Cool! Dean Rocked the House!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Got pom-poms? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
40. Pandering is what opponents call trying to connect with constituancies
If you aren't pandering you aren't winning. Calling someone a panderer is just a way to try to get them to shut up and get back into line.

I hope Dean panders to rural folks lots and lots and lots. And I hope that all the politicians do lots of pandering and the Republican politicians do no pandering whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
42. Sorry to inform you on this
ALL the candidates pander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. But Dean is the ULTIMATE... He's #1 !! (nt)
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snoochie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Oh really?
O8)

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. deleted post
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 11:32 PM by dsc
sorry brain spasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
46. I notice he changes his positions on a regular basis.
Unfortunately, his worst positions were the ones he acted on in Vermont and his better positions are at the right time to be called a campaign conversion. But then he still has trouble keeping his positions straight and has been called on this by both the L.A. Times and the N.Y. Times after debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Genius is parroting a lie (n/t)
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 09:12 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
58. I think you are a parrot
you read that somewhere, so now you just keep repeating it without actually looking at any facts. You think Saddam did 9/11 don't you?

If you pay attention at all you know that the coalition leader is very inflexible, demanding his own way on every issue. His opponents become 'irrelevant'.

However, it is considered a sign of "SANITY" to be able to change plans, to remain flexible. Rigid and inflexible, inability to get along with others, my way at all costs are signs of possible mental 'illness' (addiction) or at least maladaptive behavior.

Are you so inflexible that you can't see the advantage in changing a position when needed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. Insults from a columnist who wants Iowa to
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 08:01 PM by party_line
solve budget problems by forcing public employee unions to allow fuloughs, expansion of gambling and NO TAX HIKES!

The head of the GOP says bad things about Dean, too. I wonder if they know about the other candidates yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
49. "Dean is the ultimate!" - DAVID YEPSEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
53. Yawn
Kerry is going no where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. The funniest thing about the article is that Des Moines is more urban than
almost ANYPLACE in VT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
61. Hmmm...
Why are these 3 week-old posts suddenly being kicked to the top of P&C again? It causes one to wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
62. Maybe they meant Ultimate Winner!!!
Dean '04...The New Democratic Leader of The NEW Democratic Party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC