Michael Moore VS Bill O'Reilly - Video

[Nomad559]

Windows Streaming Video

Video Is 24.88 MB

Michael Moore VS Bill O'Reilly

[LittleApple81]

1. Thanks, Nomad! n/t

[freetobegay]

2. I had to stop watching after the first minute.

[RockaFowler]

3. Great Video

I think Michael Moore has done a great job. Let's ask ourselves - why wasn't it live?? O'Reilly is such a wimp.

[hlthe2b]

4. Yeah! Once again, Nomad559 to the rescue!

Thank YOU!

[dmr]

5. Nomad, you rock!

Thank you! How do you do this?

:yourock:

[Room101]

6. NOMAD does it again!

Thanks!

[Zinfandel]

7. Thanks man, I refuse to watch Fox, so I read about it here...And you

provided the video...I turned it off when O'Reilly went into his spin...can't stomack that shit.

Thanks again.

[bookman]

8. I wanted to scream.

Thanks for the video link.

I wanted to scream to O'Rielly.

Scott Ritter knew there were no WMD's, the inspectors were there and claimed there could be none found. Nothing could stop this administration in its march to war.

[dennis4868]

9. Moore was weak in proving that Bush lied

I said this earlier tonight that Moore could have said the following when O'Reilly said that Bush was given bad intelligence and did not lie:

The following was said By Bush in the run up to the war and all of which is not supported by any National Intelligence Report or any other intelligence agency:

1. Massive stockpile of biological weapons

2. Nuclear weapons program and could have a nuclear wepon any day

3. Unmanned aerial vehicle that can carry WMD to the USA

4. Saddam/911/al qaeda connection

5. Saddam wants to give his WMD to terrorist

6. Saddam will use his WMD against the USA

If none of this was supported by the CIA or any other intelligence agency then how can O'Reilly say that Bush was misinformed by the CIA?

Why can't a dem stand up and say this and put to rest this myth that Bush did not lie and was instead misled by the CIA?

[cprise]

10. He's a good director

...and great in the editing room.

But in debate... I agree, this was weak.

[dennis4868]

11. It is not only Moore....

who does not articulate and bring out the facts that shows that Bush did lie...every Dem on TV these days may say, "Bush lied" and then does not back it up and looks silly. If the media would have someone on from the Carnegie Endownment for International Peace on then they would be able to do it....but the media does not want to hear from the (i.e., the truth).

[granolagirl]

12. good point

you're right dennis, good point. I actually really enjoyed this debate - very entertaining - and I thought O'Reilly did a good job of sticking to the issues.

[samsingh]

13. oreilly is everything he is accusing Moore of being

why isn't oreilly going to fight in Iraq? He said he would.

Putin told Blair "Let's wait until you find WMDs in Iraq - if indeed there were any" (I'm paraphrasing)

Weapons inspectors said there were no WMDs found during their inspections.

it seems like the adherance to idealogy at all costs, despite evidence, is more applicable to Bush and Oreilly than the left.

[saracat]

14. Why didn't Putin support the war if he gave * such great info?

And why did Pooty poot only mention this afterward? And why did we NEVER mention it?