Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does the media focus on Ukraine exit poll?)Election Angst Update

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:35 PM
Original message
Why does the media focus on Ukraine exit poll?)Election Angst Update
Election Angst Update: Clark Kent Vs the Media Wimps

http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/04/11/far04040.html

November 23, 2004

Election Angst Update: Clark Kent Vs the Media Wimps

by Maureen Farrell

"The greatest threat to truth today may well be from my profession." -- Legendary reporter Carl Bernstein http://www.dailytexanonline.com/news/2004/11/12/TopStories/Reporter.Critiques.Todays.Media-802923.shtml%0D

It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. While some in the mainstream media were finally paying attention to an important story as it was unfolding (rather than waiting three years, ala the New York Times), others were taking the usual safe and tired tact.

It all started on Monday, Nov. 7, when, inspired by a Cincinnati Enquirer story on how Warren County Ohio officials had "locked down" the administration building on election night and restricted open access to the vote count there, Keith Olbermann began reporting on voting irregularities across the country. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6368819/#041107a "We have heard the message on the Voting Angst and will continue to cover it with all prudent speed," Olbermann later wrote on his blog, and sure enough, Countdown with Keith Olbermann doled out nightly nuggets -- not only concerning Votergate, but regarding the media itself. This exchange between Olbermann and Craig Crawford was especially satisfying:

CRAWFORD: "We're often wimps in the media. And we wait for other people to make charges, one political party or another, and then we investigate it. But this is the time to do this. There's still time before the <2004 election> results are certified. It doesn't mean it will change the outcome. But it is good and I congratulate you for looking at some of these irregularities. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6452480/

OLBERMANN: "I congratulate you for joining me on the crap list for saying that there are wimps in the media. Amen, brother.

(LAUGHTER)

OLBERMANN: We know it and now everybody else knows it.

Was that good for you, too?

While it's true that Mr. Olbermann was recently voted America's "Sexiest Newscaster," the further he strays from the herd, the hotter he gets. "There's a story here, I happen to have a newscast, maybe I should cover it," Olbermann humbly told NPR, sounding a bit like Clark Kent/Superman in the process.

Lest you think my enthusiasm is part and parcel of some nerdish crush, I assure you, it cuts deeper. As a newspaperman's daughter and newspaperwoman's granddaughter, the frustration I've felt these past four years has prompted thoughts and feelings uncomfortably removed from the mainstream. In the summer of 2002, for example, I wrote about the growing number of states linking drivers' license applications to selective service registration and wondered if the U.S. was gearing up for the draft. (I still believe it is). And six months before the start of the war, with neck fully extended, I expressed doubts about the existence of Iraq's WMD. <snip>

BELOW IS A URL HISTORY OF MEDIA WHORE/WIMP IGNORED/IGNORING FACTUAL STORIES FROM THE ARTICLE:

http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000641.php

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/2002/09/05_Stepford.html

http://nick.assumption.edu/WebVAX/Foster/AIMmm10Aug95.html

http://mediamatters.org/items/200405210006

http://mediamatters.org/items/200411160006

http://www.ctnow.com/features/lifestyle/hc-wherenow.artnov12,0,4475379,print.story

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23580-2004Nov3.html

http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/ale04090.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1118-11.htm

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/112204A.shtml

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/WO0411/S00225.htm

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3339650/

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-0/109955354511020.xml

http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/04/11/ana04028.html

http://homepage.mac.com/duffyb/nobush/iMovieTheater256.html

http://avirubin.com/vote/analysis/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/30/elec04.election.worries/

http://www.votergate.tv/

http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/relatedarticles/19416.php

http://www.onthemedia.org/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6368819/#041119a

http://www.observer.com/pages/story.asp?ID=3502

http://www.observer.com/pages/frontpage8.asp

http://www.sacbee.com/state_wire/story/11436220p-12350492c.html

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1116-33.htm

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1118-22.htm

http://rottendenmark.blogspot.com/

http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4007

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38000-2004Nov9.html

http://verifiedvoting.org/article.php?id=5213&printsafe=1

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/13/235655/22

http://www.law.yale.edu/outside/html/Public_Affairs/537/yls_article.htm

http://shadowbox.i8.com/stolen.htm#articles

http://www.observer.com/pages/frontpage8.asp

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6446237/#041111c

http://www.fair.org/media-beat/021029.html

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/111304.html

http://villagenews.weblogger.com/stories/storyReader$10577

http://avirubin.com/vote/



POSTED IN EDITORIALS ON DU AT:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x87731
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our Media is Barred from mentioning any election problems... Fascists don't
tolerate free speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2.  HOW TO PUT MORE PRESSURE ON MSM (by cloudythescribbler in DU- Ed)
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 03:40 PM by papau
I thought this should be reposted - it is an interesting post from the prior posting in DU-Editorial on this topic.

cloudythescribbler (10 posts) Tue Nov-23-04 10:52 AM
HOW TO PUT MORE PRESSURE ON MSM


First there needs to be an organization to do it. You need to put together an organization on the election fraud issue, initially on the web, widely disseminating your clickable website, to pressure the media ON THIS ISSUE. This group needs to get going in a matter of days to make a difference. They should focus VERY HOT attention on the 'progressive' bloggers who have been dragging their feet. Postings on sites or communications to and about these bloggers -- including spinsanity, Eschaton, and Talking Points Memo, but also Media Matters & MichaelMoore.com would be a start. There are also less obvious sites, like OpenDemocracy and Emerging Democratic Majority to post.
The media issue people would focus also on letters ABOUT the media lockdown naming issues and newspapers in letters to the editor of LOCAL newspapers across the country, and try to gather together email lists for letters to the editor in newspapers where they are more than likely to be printed. Unfortunately local papers are often VERY SLOW about printing letters.
There could also branch out into PROTESTS -- focused on MAJOR MEDIA, including the NY Times, and others who have been burying this story. PUT MAXIMUM pressure on PUBLIC radio, like NPR, as they really should pay FULL attention to this issue, including the issue of the MEDIA LOCKDOWN. calls into radio stations could request programs specifically devoted to election fraud issue, and specifically devoted to media lockdown of this issue.
There is apparently MORE coverage of this issue, ironically, in the MSM in Britain and Canada than in the US. This is bizarre. Sure the mass media are just a machine for justifying the lying, but I haven't seen them so systematically BURY such an active story with so many people talking about it and so many REAL stories breaking regularly. Trying to get international media to focus coverage on media lockdown in US would be a good idea.
If people or groups with money support this, they could do more, like buying FULL PAGE ADS in the NY Times, highlighting media lockdown issue IN THE NEW YORK TIMES ITSELF and elsewhere.

These methods would be a start



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC