Darknyte7
(687 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 02:49 PM
Original message |
Does anyone know when Fox News' FCC license is up for renewal? |
|
I heard something about it on AAR yesterday.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What are the odds that that one will be rubber stamped? |
|
Good job fellas, Keep it up!
|
GottiBys
(16 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I don't think they have anything to |
|
worry about. For some undeniable reason, they have great ratings. Somebody's watching them.
|
AllegroRondo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Popularity has nothing to do with it |
|
if they are violating the law, by not operating in the public interest, they should not have their license renewed. Lying and distorting the news is definitely NOT in the public interest.
|
Darknyte7
(687 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
And that's exactly where I'm going with this...
|
rumpel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. wish we can also pull the administration under the same code |
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Individual Pox stations can be challenged. |
|
A broadcast license applies only to broadcast media, which lease the public's airwaves (yes, we own 'em) in return for serving the public interest.
When licenses come up for renewal, that's the time to start petitions to get licenses revoked. Sinclair stations are prime targets because of their shameful record of bias toward the GOP and neglect of real news.
Right wing hate radio, especially stations that carry Savage and other foamers, is also ripe for targeting, again by petition.
Demanding balance on OUR airwaves is not censorship. Attacking stations that offer only bias and propaganda with no opposing viewpoint is essential.
It's one way we can take the media back from the fascist propaganda machine.
|
Darknyte7
(687 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Journalists petition FCC to challenge Fox-13 license renewal January 3, 2005 Two TV journalists have challenged the broadcast license renewal of WTVT Fox-13 asserting it deliberately broadcast false and distorted news reports. link: http://www.bizjournals.com/industries/high_tech/cable_tv_radio/2005/01/03/tampabay_daily9.html
|
ashling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
they are not licensed by the FCC. FCC has no jurisdiction over cable.
|
Darknyte7
(687 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I'm sorry, but I know that's not correct... |
|
take a look at "History of U.S. cable TV and its regulation" at the link below. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_television
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I don't believe Cable Channels are regulated much |
|
It's only channels that are broadcast through the air like your local ABC, CBS, etc channels.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Bush* will hand deliver it to Rupert Murdoch when renewed. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |