Stevendsmith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:29 PM
Original message |
Candy Crowley: Bush's Gal |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:41 PM by Stevendsmith
Okay, I changed the title. Jeez!
Did anyone catch her and "Valley Girl" Daryn Kagan snickering about how childish the Dems conducted themselves at last night's debate? Between these two, Judy Woodruff, Paula Zahn, and Bill Snyder, CNN is giving FOX a run for its money as the premiere BushCo propaganda machine.
|
Jack_Dawson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Did she used to be <200 lbs? |
|
I swear she used to be skinny...or am I thinking of someone else?
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. You are right Jack Dawson |
|
Candy used to be lighter than she is today. That is merely an objective answer to an objective question. Candy being a slut for bush is not a weighty issue. Jack Dawson did not bash her for her weight, he merely asked a question. Let us turn our attention to the pounds of evidence being mounted against CNN as they choose to be more Fox like and strive to put them on a diet. Unless, of course, we must be sensitive to the point of uncaring.
|
cindyw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I may agree with your assessment of her behaivior, but I find this |
|
bash on her weight to be in exceptionally poor taste.
Thumbs down to you.
:thumbsdown:
|
Stevendsmith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I knew that was coming |
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Agreed, there's plenty to pick on her about |
|
and that Daryn Kagan is simply vile. But lay off the weight issues.
|
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I dislike her too. But consider this about the weight comments. How |
|
many of the dissenters to this kind of remark dissent when people talk about Rush Limbaugh. <Not trying to flame here. Just an honest question I've been working up my nerve to ask for months>
Rush Pigboy Limpbag. Just a few of the names he's called to universal acclaim. If its okay to pillory him, and the silence such comment universally receives indicates acclaim, then Crowley is fair game. If that is the way its done against swinish men, then swinish women should be given equal time.
RV, who could care less about the fat on their asses, male or female. Its the fat in their heads that bothers me.
|
cindyw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Swinish women? So all fat people are pigs? |
|
Rush Limbaugh is on another level. He's on more of a male chauvinist pig level than the body fat level.
Can we all agree that Limbaugh was a big fat (not in weight) idiot even when he was thin?
|
otohara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-15-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 05:16 PM by otohara
n/t
|
johnfunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-17-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
9. As Bartcop so drolly observes... |
|
... "Wonder why they call her 'Candy'."
|
EdWesKer
(24 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
watercolors
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
anoys me, I don't find her ofensive, enjoy her , kind of a relief from all the pathetic bimbos that are on!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |