Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Memories - CATO: Al Gore's Risky Budget Policies & privatize Social Securi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:53 AM
Original message
Memories - CATO: Al Gore's Risky Budget Policies & privatize Social Securi


http://www.ourfuture.org/issues_and_campaigns/socialsecurity/key_issues/money_trail_and_wall_street/readarticle737.cfm

Wall Street Ponies Up to Back Bush's Social Security Plan
By: John D. McKinnon & John Harwood
Date: 6/12/01 Source: The Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON -- As the Bush administration officially launches its effort to privatize Social Security, it is about to get a big -- and generous -- helping hand from investment firms.

http://www.cato.org/dailys/09-08-00.html

Al Gore's Risky Budget Policies
by Doug Bandow

Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

In Vice President Al Gore's mind, nothing is riskier than letting taxpayers keep more of their money. Which makes his election the riskiest action American voters could take.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates a cumulative $4.6 trillion surplus through 2010. Alas, it has never been more obvious that budget surpluses are more dangerous than deficits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-04 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Such a crock of B.S. they spread in 2000 that Al Gore was so risky
by advocating modest targeted tax cuts instead of the extravagant across the board Bush cuts that are bankrupting us now. The Bush ads now are trying to scare voters by claiming that Kerry will raise taxes by $900 billion in his first 100 days.

The article fails to explain in any way why having a budget surplus would have been so risky but that's a moot point for sure now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC