Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How U.S. Income Tax Cuts Are Really Tax Increases - Bloomberg's Wasik

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 11:42 AM
Original message
How U.S. Income Tax Cuts Are Really Tax Increases - Bloomberg's Wasik
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&refer=columnist_wasik&sid=aUfkWACqky5c

How U.S. Income Tax Cuts Are Really Tax Increases: John Wasik
Oct. 4 (Bloomberg) -- While purring about middle-class tax breaks, U.S. lawmakers who backed them ignored how the cuts would further accelerate state and local tax increases.

The $146 billion ``Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004'' -- passed by Congress on Sept. 23 -- will actually increase the total tax burden for most households.

The tax savings will hold up like papier-mache when you consider how other taxes shred the federal breaks. The alternative minimum tax as well as state and local levies will continue to balloon as the new law vacuums money from the coffers of local schools, agencies and state governments.

``The decline in federal revenue sharing causes a greater burden on middle-class homeowners,'' said Richard Roll, head of the American Homeowners Association, a national consumer membership organization. ``The federal tax cuts have a concealed effect. It's a detriment.''
<snip>

While Congress has passed legislation to bolster national security and education (``No Child Left Behind Act'') and to fund Iraq and Afghanistan reconstruction, it has shortchanged state and local governments with ``unfunded mandates,'' which are laws passed by Congress without adequate funding given to states to implement them.

The federal government's spending binge and tax-cut shortfalls shifted some $33 billion in bills to deficit-ridden state and local agencies in fiscal year 2005. These expenses are passed on to you through higher sales, excise, small-business and property taxes, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, an association that represents state lawmakers. As a result, state taxes alone rose by $18 billion from 2000 to 2003.

Combining the effects of record home appreciation with federal-revenue shortfalls, local tax authorities have increased property-tax bills as much as 56 percent during the last four years in some areas. <snip>

The easing of the marriage penalty in the current tax law, which lowers effective tax rates for dual-income married couples, also can be a wash. The alternative tax affects middle-class married couples with children the most.

``Virtually all (94 percent) of married couples with two or more children and adjusted gross income between $75,000 and $100,000 will be on the AMT by 2010,'' the center's update on the AMT stated recently. <snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC