Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Age discrimination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 12:42 PM
Original message
Age discrimination
Edited on Mon Jan-31-05 12:50 PM by Robert Oak
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/209943_agebias31.html


Several weeks after being laid off last spring by Best Buy, the consumer electronics retailer, Lynette Steuck, a software project manager, showed up for a resume-polishing "outplacement session" of the sort commonly offered to employees recently shoved out the door.

As Steuck, 51, a divorced mother, surveyed the sparely furnished conference room, she said she was struck by something. "It was shocking," she recalled recently. "There were probably 25 to 30 people in the session. And there were only three or four people under the age of 40."


I'm posting this one on best buy because this is a seriously underreported story. IT has been discriminating against engineers
over 40 for a long time...and they can get away with it because technology changes basically every 5 years, so expertise in a particular skill has a shelf life of 5 years...although older engineers still have
superior skills overall usually because of overall experience.
(and older engineers have the skills too, staying up on the latest
is part of engineering).

Let's do the math: 6 years of education (Masters) 85k, 17 years total
of a career - layoff times (let's say 3 years total) 14 years.

hmmm....and this assumes someone graduates at age 23.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ArmHayseed Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. More to come
The more Republican judges elected/appointed the more often these cases will be lost in court.

A small wager that the employees were non-union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
German-Lefty Donating Member (568 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Programmers peak at about 7 years.
After that time, they start moving on to management and design. At least that's what I heard back in college. I don't want piss anyone off, but there are sometimes older IT people that have stopped learning years ago. I remember IBM a few years back let people go who insisted on not learning anything but fortran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. that just isn't true anymore
what about researcher PHD's?

They often not only are up on the latest skills, they often have invented them...

yet they are canned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idlisambar Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Case-by-case
Edited on Sat Feb-05-05 01:41 AM by idlisambar
There is an element of truth to what you are saying, but working in software myself I know a lot of good programmers who have been at it a while. Some people get tired of the technical side and want to take a management track, but each individual is different. Such things can be evaluated on a person by person basis, there is really no rational for age discrimination other than to get rid of more expensive employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rememberingGandhi Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. expensive employees
"there is really no rationale for age discrimination other than to get rid of more expensive employees"

Is "getting rid of more expensive employees" a valid rationale?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gene Starwind Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Always unjustified.
There's never any justification for ageism, and especially on the official level of the corporatocracy. That's the end of my story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rememberingGandhi Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I agree that ageism has no place...
... I was trying to point out that simply cutting people off because they were "more expensive" is wrong too. Meaning to say, if a company fires people simply for being "too expensive", that company should be held accountable, even if the people fired are not older than those retained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idlisambar Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. valid rational?
From the perspective of the bottom-line for the company, yes often it can be. From the perspective of societal welfare, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. the rationale is to get rid of employees before they retire with BENEFITs
That's the ticket. For the corporations. The people in those sessions were all 40-54. If they are vested and get to 55, they get a pension with MEDICAL BENEFITS. Couldn't have that now, could we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Haven't worked in 30 mos. Will turn 50 in June.
Last time I learned a new language, I was writing testable code in two weeks. Did this four times in the last six years. MS Computer Science, credentials out the wazoo. I can't even find jobs that call for my skills. The jobs I do find, I'm so overqualified for, I never get a response from the employer.

Anybody need a weapons systems / aircraft systems designer with tons of peripheral skills?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. if you've got a security clearance
try contract....since they pay no benies they often ignore
age (which is plain sick) but the security clearance for short term
contracts is very difficult to find for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. My clearance has expired
but most software shops will foot the bill for a renewal on a six month contract. Problem is, there just aren't any jobs calling for my skills in my area, and moving is financially out of the question. The Austin / San Antonio corridor was hot for aerospace in the early nineties, but the high tech stuff just vanished. Part of the late nineties consolidation of weapons makers, mostly. Even space stuff is hard to come by now, and all of it is European Space Agency contracts. Used to do a booming business in NASA contracts around here.

Hey George! Where the fuck is all the funding to send us to mars?? Oh yeah! That was just your ass talking. Just like everything else you say that isn't declaring war or cutting taxes on the rich.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. another suggestion
answer those many contractor headhunter ads in monster looking for a security clearance and take a temporary assignment ...sometimes
they will pay for a per diem, you keep your permanent residence in Austin but just living temporarily in the area of the contract.

You can write off all temporary living as part of your business expenses.

I have no idea if security jobs will allow telecommute. I don't have
any clearances.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-20-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Unemployed 59 Months Will Turn 48 In April I Feel Your Pain
As the big Dawg used to say.

Ex telecom worker here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. age discrim.
One of the reasons cos. give for age discrimination is for those cos. actually still offering health bennies, older workers cost more to insure. Our insane healthcare-only-for-the-wealthy system in the U.S., w/its lack of universal healthcare, is keeping cos. from expanding due to insanely high healthcare costs. What dumb-fsck republinazis can't realize is that a healthier workforce is a more productive workforce, plus their precious nazi gated communities won't be able to keep out diseases.




"Prosperity is just around the corner." -- Herbert Hoover
"The economy has turned a corner." -- GW Bush

Herbert Hoover = GW Bush

Neither man cared about the Depression their economic policies created.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC