Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does "capital" refer to machines and equipment used in manufacturing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-18-08 08:50 AM
Original message
Does "capital" refer to machines and equipment used in manufacturing?
Perhaps senior managers are responding to American critics of "capitalism" by moving the "capital" (along with the manufacturing jobs) away to places that are outside America and far from the critics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DavidMS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. From a Accounting perspective
IIRC, its labeled Property, Plant & Equipment. Also known as fixed assets.

On the bright side, given the slide in the dollar. We will soon see more countries outsourcing to us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. They're responding to American critics of "capitalism" by moving the "capital" to China ???
I guess that makes as much sense as anything else they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. The "capital" in "capitalism"
"Capital" refers to money loaned or invested in expectation of an acceptable return at an acceptable level of risk.

Basically, it's spare cash that you rent out.

Capital has been internationally mobile for as long as the nation-state system has been in place, say 400 years. Some historians trace the interaction of capital and territorial powers, noting a pattern: states borrow very heavily when they rise in prominence, competing with others for mobile capital, and the nation that lends to them most heavily eventually succeeds them as the pre-eminent one.

Hegemony went from the Dutch, then to Britain, then the U.S., and now, apparently, China. In each case, the rising hegemon held a huge amount of the declining hegemon's debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC