Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thomas Friedman: Truth or Consequences

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:57 PM
Original message
Thomas Friedman: Truth or Consequences
The New York Times

May 28, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
Truth or Consequences
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

(snip)

I can’t say it better than my friend Tim Shriver, the chairman of Special Olympics, did in a Memorial Day essay in The Washington Post: “So Dodge wants to sell you a car you don’t really want to buy, that is not fuel-efficient, will further damage our environment, and will further subsidize oil states, some of which are on the other side of the wars we’re currently fighting. ... The planet be damned, the troops be forgotten, the economy be ignored: buy a Dodge.”

No, our mythical candidate would say the long-term answer is to go exactly the other way: guarantee people a high price of gasoline — forever. This candidate would note that $4-a-gallon gasoline is really starting to impact driving behavior and buying behavior in way that $3-a-gallon gas did not. The first time we got such a strong price signal, after the 1973 oil shock, we responded as a country by demanding and producing more fuel-efficient cars. But as soon as oil prices started falling in the late 1980s and early 1990s, we let Detroit get us readdicted to gas guzzlers, and the price steadily crept back up to where it is today.

We must not make that mistake again. Therefore, what our mythical candidate would be proposing, argues the energy economist Philip Verleger Jr., is a “price floor” for gasoline: $4 a gallon for regular unleaded, which is still half the going rate in Europe today. Washington would declare that it would never let the price fall below that level. If it does, it would increase the federal gasoline tax on a monthly basis to make up the difference between the pump price and the market price. To ease the burden on the less well-off, “anyone earning under $80,000 a year would be compensated with a reduction in the payroll taxes,” said Verleger. Or, he suggested, the government could use the gasoline tax to buy back gas guzzlers from the public and “crush them.”

But the message going forward to every car buyer and carmaker would be this: The price of gasoline is never going back down. Therefore, if you buy a big gas guzzler today, you are locking yourself into perpetually high gasoline bills. You are buying a pig that will eat you out of house and home. At the same time, if you, a manufacturer, continue building fleets of nonhybrid gas guzzlers, you are condemning yourself, your employees and shareholders to oblivion.

(snip)

We need to make a structural shift in our energy economy. Ultimately, we need to move our entire fleet to plug-in electric cars. The only way to get from here to there is to start now with a price signal that will force the change.

(snip)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/28/opinion/28friedman.html?_r=1&scp=15&sq=McCain&st=nyt&oref=slogin


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL. Really innovative stuff there, Tom.
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 03:09 PM by ryanmuegge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Isn't he just cutting edge?
Always ahead of the trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. his cabdriver - the one with all the examples
is going to be angry at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. haha!
Cabdrivers are awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. What we need is your A** in Jail, Tom
Suck on This, bastard....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. "...and the price steadily crept back up to where it is today."
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 03:24 PM by Jim__
Horseshit! The price skyrocketed after junior came to office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not exactly
It is pretty much accepted that the increase demand in China and in India is a major factor. This means that we are not going to see the price dropping anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC