Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Book Value: A Meaningless Measure of a Bank’s Worth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:01 PM
Original message
Book Value: A Meaningless Measure of a Bank’s Worth
Call it the downgrade that launched a thousand “sells.”

Goldman Sachs Group downgraded Citigroup to a “conviction sell” and had a go at Merrill Lynch–which it expects to take a $4.2 billion third-quarter write-down–and J.P. Morgan, which Goldman expects to take a $1.2 billion write-down. Then, just as the selling frenzy in the markets hit fever pitch, Fitch Ratings caved to Ambac Financial Group and MBIA and stopped rating them.

On a day when the market was a whole suffered a more than 350-point downgrade, the financial sector is a bright, shining light of disaster for investors. And today’s downdraft highlights a growing problem for investors in the financial sector: “book value,” a measure of the strength of a financial institution’s balance sheet, has been a meaningless term nearly all year.

Here is the problem: bank balance sheets have massive amounts of debt. As write-downs related that debt pile up–and may even ascend to $1.3 trillion for the industry, according to hedge fund manager John Paulson–it is nearly impossible to pin down just how much debt is actually affected. With no reliable picture of the bad-debt exposure, you can’t get book value.

Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Brad Hintz wrote today: “Bernstein has used price-to-book metrics to value the large capitalization securities firms. Because earnings were difficult to be accurately forecasted and book value was viewed as a hard number, price-to-book was preferred to price-to-earnings. Historically, the price-to-book valuation of the securities firms has been correlated with ROE/cost of equity, credit ratings and business mix….Unfortunately, with the book value being used for future valuation uncertain, cost of capital increasing, credit ratings at risk and the business mix of these firm’s shifting as leverage changes, the results of these valuation regressions should be viewed only as long-term estimates in a ‘normalized environment.’”

WSJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Book value is always meaningless. When a business is sold the assets are revalued to market value.
Reason being that market value is the amount of cash that an asset could be exchanged for. Book value may or may not be anywhere near the amount of cash that an asset could be exchanged for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC