Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bernie Sanders Bail Out Proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 09:58 PM
Original message
Bernie Sanders Bail Out Proposal
Edited on Sat Sep-20-08 10:02 PM by liberalmuse
Sanders Op-Ed: Billions for Bailouts! Who Pays? -- 09/19/2008

By Senator Bernie Sanders

The current financial crisis facing our country has been caused by the extreme right-wing economic policies pursued by the Bush administration. These policies, which include huge tax breaks for the rich, unfettered free trade and the wholesale deregulation of commerce, have resulted in a massive redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the very wealthy.

The middle class has really been under assault. Since President Bush has been in office, nearly 6 million Americans have slipped into poverty, median family income for working Americans has declined by more than $2,000, more than 7 million Americans have lost their health insurance, over 4 million have lost their pensions, foreclosures are at an all time high, total consumer debt has more than doubled, and we have a national debt of over $9.7 trillion dollars...

AND:

(1) The people who can best afford to pay and the people who have benefited most from Bush’s economic policies are the people who should provide the funds for the bailout. It would be immoral to ask the middle class, the people whose standard of living has declined under Bush, to pay for this bailout while the rich, once again, avoid their responsibilities. Further, if the government is going to save companies from bankruptcy, the taxpayers of this country should be rewarded for assuming the risk by sharing in the gains that result from this government bailout.

Specifically, to pay for the bailout, which is estimated to cost up to $1 trillion, the government should:

a) Impose a five-year, 10 percent surtax on income over $1 million a year for couples and over $500,000 for single taxpayers. That would raise more than $300 billion in revenue;...


More here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. "If a company is too big to fail it is too big to exist."
"We need to determine which companies fall in this category and then break them up."

This is the only man in America who makes any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. If a "shortage" is due to falling housing values
and foreclosures, why not bail out the people who are living in the houses so they can make their mortgage payments?
A little trickle up so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. One question?
Everybody is talking about those people having 'problems' paying their mortgages. I take that to mean those that are behind on their payments or are barely able to make their payments each month. I see no problem in helping those people but how about all the people that have been able to do it right and are not struggling quite as much as the less fortunate. If we are going to help those Americans with mortgages I think all holders should benefit. I would support some limit on which mortgage holders would be helped in the sense that those holding $10,000,000.00 mortgages on some McMansion in Beverly Hills should not be rewarded for extending themselves that far (sorry Ed McMahon). Deciding exactly how much and who gets would be an interesting exercise but I am sure it could be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love Bernie, but this is NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
He admits that the bailout could cost $1 Trillion, and then proposes a tax surcharge that will raise $300B. That still leaves the rest of us on the hook for $700B! The rest of his proposals are great ideas, but ideas that will cost even more money. Where is this money coming from?

The bottom line is this: The bailout SHOULD NOT HAPPEN. The tax surcharge and the rest of his proposals SHOULD HAPPEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keyrads Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. BAIL OUT
Why should the middle class pay for this ridiculous mess ?
If we are going to be foolish enough to bail them out then the players in this game should pay for it .
Why not institute a tax on stock trades instead of penalizing the working people ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Welcome to DU nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent article.
I don't see much hope of any of this happening at the moment, but hopefully after Obama gets in we'll see things similar to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. HA! The real socialist Bernie tells the wannabe socialist-fat cats what time it is
Go Bernie, hooray Vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. He forgot a few things
1. End the Iraq War now (at least a $100b savings).

2. Increase the tax on capital gains to make it equal to the tax on income

3. A one-time 10% asset tax on people with assets in excess of $1m, excluding primary home and retirement funds.

4. Reduce homeland security funding.

This would go a long way in paying for the bailout.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC