Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ CLAIMS DERIVATIVES BEAST DOESN’T EXIST!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:55 AM
Original message
WSJ CLAIMS DERIVATIVES BEAST DOESN’T EXIST!

As the US ‘rescue’ adds more and more trillions to our national debt every hour of every day, there is a continuing push to pretend the Derivatives Beast is NOT at the bottom of this at all. Oh, not at all! Why, the ONLY market that seems to be ‘orderly’ these days is the hyper-secretive, dark, smelly, ugly little gnome deal making with each other in public. This is sort of like using an outhouse rather than a bank to process wealth. Remember, Dr. Freud told us that defecation is intimately connected to wealth accumulations emotions.

A dear reader sent me the Wall Street Journal’s latest Murdoch Report:


When Even Good News Worsens a Panic - WSJ.com

From the start of the credit crisis, panic has been caused by what we didn’t know. What happens if a Lehman Brothers is allowed to fail? What happens if toxic mortgage-backed securities are bought through a government bailout? Then, what happens if the Treasury decides not to bail the banks out of these bad debts?

So it should have been reassuring that one of the most nerve-racking of the unknowns turned out to be benign.

We now know that we should not have feared huge losses in the multitrillion-dollar, unregulated market for esoteric instruments called credit default swaps. Transactions in this market have been orderly, and the losses have been modest.
And what is this ‘good news’ that has that old devil, Murdoch, chortling in his cups of hot toddy today? Why, the Derivatives Swap Markets that are NOT based on ‘mark to market’ but rather, on totally false premises, is ‘working’! Wow. Could have fooled me. Except I don’t go to gnomes, especially very old and extremely ugly gnomes, for financial advice.

http://emsnews2.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/wsj-claims-derivatives-beast-doesnt-exist/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. my Fux/dittohead brother said
Edited on Thu Nov-27-08 11:12 AM by pansypoo53219
the poor people and fanny mae/freedy mac created this mess. so it's clintons fault. i think i got the warning on derivatives from my washington monthly in the 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC