Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmaker says SEC hindering House's Madoff probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:53 PM
Original message
Lawmaker says SEC hindering House's Madoff probe

WASHINGTON (AP) — House lawmakers on Wednesday accused the Securities and Exchange Commission of impeding their probe into the agency's failure to uncover the alleged $50 billion Bernard Madoff fraud.

The clash between lawmakers and high-ranking SEC officials at a House Financial Services subcommittee hearing came after the man who waged a decade-long campaign to alert the regulators to problems in Madoff's operations denounced the agency for its inaction. Whistleblower Harry Markopolos also said he had feared for his physical safety and would turn over new evidence that Madoff had not acted alone.

In loud, angry exchanges, lawmakers threatened to issue subpoenas to SEC officials to compel their testimony in the case.

Pennsylvania Democrat Paul Kanjorski, the panel's chairman, vented frustration after the SEC's acting general counsel said the five officials appearing at the hearing couldn't answer lawmakers' questions about the Madoff case because it's under investigation. The five SEC commissioners voted earlier to assert a privilege in not having officials answer lawmakers' questions.

Kanjorski accused the agency of impeding the panel's investigation, calling it a "lack of cooperation" and an "abuse of authority."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jFqIBk_at-eY6cwSjoZzZ3FqWb5AD964VB8O0

In the hearing the SEC lawyer tried to claim EXECUTIVE PRIVILAGE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is quite apparent that the SEC is complicit in the Madoff scam
Possibly a collaborator, which means possible charges...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. That smells like collusion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. So now, what do we know?
What we know is that the level of corruption in the SEC is astronomical, or they would not be stonewalling. That's what we know.

I would say it's time to send in the FBI, but I fear they are as bad, if not worse. DoJ? :rofl:

As if.

Le heritage' du chimpanze'. It will be around for a long time. Especially in the meat puppets they left behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'd like to see subpoenas issued to that same SEC bunch and force them
to testify in front of the same panel they had today. I watched the whole thing. It was amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. There were 8 SEC probes over 10 years
and one of them was aimed specifically at uncovering a Ponzi scheme.

While Madoff was clearly able to charm the birdies out of the trees, no one is that charming.

He had a friend or friends in the SEC. Of course they're going to stonewall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC