Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TARP for small business?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:15 AM
Original message
TARP for small business?

It's a great idea!

The Washington Post has a pretty bizarre story up tonight. The Administration is thinking about releasing TARP funds as loans to small businesses.

Stress the thinking part. As in big-time thinking. As in long way from action. Which begs the question as to why this is a news story. Since I am of the view that pretty much every news story is a plant or a leak, at least if any semi-well run entity is involved, one then must ponder the purpose in having such an early-stage idea come to light. Is it to flush out support, or to give opponents a chance to rally?

Key bits of the Washington Post article. At the beginning, the confident tone makes it sound as if the program is on the runway, ready for takeoff:

The Obama administration is developing an initiative to take money from the $700 billion rescue program for the banking system and make it available to millions of small businesses, which officials say are essential to any economic recovery because they employ so many people, according to sources familiar with the plan.

The effort would represent a striking shift from the rescue program's original mandate, since it would direct billions of bailout dollars toward a plan that aims more at saving jobs than at righting the financial system. Some economists estimate that small businesses, defined as firms with fewer than 500 workers, employ most of the country's workforce.

A proposal being floated by senior Treasury Department officials calls for using the bailout funds to expand a government program that helps small companies borrow from banks at low rates to keep their businesses going, the sources said. These "working-capital" loans would come with few restrictions and could be used to buy inventory, hold on to employees and pay off short-term debt.

The initiative would bulk up the Small Business Administration's most popular lending program, called 7(a). Lines of credit for small companies could greatly increase in size. If a firm failed despite receiving this help, the government would cover most of the losses on the federal loan, perhaps as much as 90 percent. Lines of credit act like the credit cards for companies -- short-term, revolving debt used to pay a variety of immediate expenses.

But then, four paragraphs further down, we get to this:

Administration officials said discussions are in the early stages and that no plan is expected before the fall. Concepts now on the table may evolve or be scrapped altogether, they said. No dollar figure has been set.

But discussions about the plan have reached the highest levels of the government. In a meeting at the White House last week, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner expressed support for the proposal, but National Economic Council Director Lawrence H. Summers was more skeptical. Neither has made up his mind, officials said...

The debate over the proposal has centered on whether taxpayers would be protected and whether banks that make these loans to small firms would lower their lending standards if the government promises to cover loans that go bad, according to participants present or briefed on the discussions.

Yves here. Hhm. We didn't hear much on worries about losses when it came to propping up housing prices. Clearly the National Association of Realtors and of course the banks are better at lobbying than small businessmen, who are not exactly a force to be reckoned with on K Street. Back to the story:

Administration officials want to prevent small businesses from closing and adding their workers to the growing ranks of the unemployed. Some officials say small companies are key to reversing the soaring unemployment rate, which has hit 9.5 percent, the highest since the early 1980s. Small businesses employ 60 percent to 80 percent of all workers, according to some economists, though others say those figures are too high.

Yves again. It is a little late to be waking up to that concern. We pointed out that American Express had entirely shut two small business lending programs last December and this January, when it was the first credit card issuer to target small businesses and had a good sized program. Banks have been cutting credit lines on credit cards, a key source of small business funding, for what, at least a year? Advanta, focused solely on small business credit cards, shut down all credit extension as of June. The damage of credit curtailment is swift for businesses that need it. Yes it is better to do something late than never. but fall (even assuming this gets up and running in the fall, fall was the timetable for merely moving this forward) is way way too late. Many small businesses have large Christmas sales, which requires them to commit to inventory in advance. which (I presume) is summer at the latest for manufacturers, fall for retailers. The failure to consider timing suggests the designers have limited real-world input, which is not a good sign.

The further you get into the story, the more apparent it becomes that this program will never see the light of day, or if it does, it will be more PR than substance:

Aiding small businesses could be a gamble because they have a poorer record than large corporations when repaying loans; it would be the riskiest government investment so far under the bailout plan. Officials are trying to design the program to exclude companies that are likely to fail even if they received federal aid, people with knowledge of the discussions said.

Some administration officials hoped to present several proposals to President Obama last week. But the meeting has been put on hold indefinitely while the Treasury conducts a deeper analysis of the problems afflicting small companies.


Yves here. I cannot believe we have this "corporations have a better odds of repayment" twattle. Did they put AIG and Citi in their sample?

This story at the Wall Street Journal. "Major Lender Faces Crunch." may explain why this not-likely-to-be-a-program idea is being put forth now. CIT, which lends to nearly 1 million small businesses, is going down for the count. Let's see, how many people might those businesses employ? And how many really need that credit from CIT?

From the Journal:

CIT Group Inc., a lender to almost a million mostly small and midsize businesses across the country, is preparing for a possible bankruptcy filing after so far failing to win a government guarantee to help it borrow, said people familiar with the matter....

The mere hiring of bankruptcy counsel doesn't mean a company will actually make a bankruptcy filing. CIT has been pressing its case "with increased urgency to the government,"...

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/07/white-house-sorta-kinda-thinkin-bout.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. While I want more small business loans,
Edited on Sat Jul-11-09 11:16 AM by Eric J in MN
...the administration should get new legislation for this.

The TARP bill doesn't say it's to guarantee loans.

Do we want the next Republican administration using TARP to guarantee loans for building nuclear power plants?

I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. A loan I can't repay doesn't help
My business, my employees or the taxpayers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Abq_Sarah said:
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 08:45 AM by marketcrazy1
""A loan I can't repay doesn't help

My business, my employees or the taxpayers."" -- but it keeps your company in business a little longer ( maybe ) and makes your bankruptcy a little more complicated and kicks the can a little further down the road! sounds like a great idea! ,,, :sarcasm: --- and even better, if you can get a non recourse loan from the government you could use it to pay off some of your full recourse debt before you file for bankruptcy! your creditors are going to love this idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. did the bankers get LOANS?
Or did they get bailouts?

This sounds like more profit for bankers! Loaning $ out to small businesses and earning more profit.

Thanks, but no thanks.

Damned ghouls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC