Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wells Fargo Sues Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo Denies Allegations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:04 PM
Original message
Wells Fargo Sues Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo Denies Allegations


You can't expect a bank that is dumb enough to sue itself to know why it is suing itself.

Yet I could not resist asking Wells Fargo Bank NA why it filed a civil complaint against itself in a mortgage foreclosure case in Hillsborough County, Fla.

"Due to state foreclosure laws, lenders are obligated to name and notify subordinate lien holders," said Wells Fargo spokesman Kevin Waetke.

Being a taxpayer-subsidized, too-big-to-fail institution, it's possible that one of the few ways for Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC: 22.91, -0.34, -1.46%) to know what it is doing is to notify itself with a court filing.

In this particular case, Wells Fargo holds the first and second mortgages on a condominium, according to Sarasota, Fla., attorney Dan McKillop, who represents the condo owner.

As holder of the first, Wells Fargo is suing all other lien holders, including the holder of the second, which is itself.

"The primary reason is to clear title and ownership interest in a property to prepare it for sale," Waetke said in an email exchange. "So it really is not Wells Fargo vs. Wells Fargo."

Yet court documents clearly label "Wells Fargo Bank NA" as the plaintiff and "Wells Fargo Bank NA" as a defendant.

Wells Fargo hired Florida Default Law Group., P.L., of Tampa, Fla., to file the lawsuit against itself.

And then Wells Fargo hired another Tampa law firm -- Kass, Shuler, Solomon, Spector, Foyle & Singer P.A. -- to defend itself against its own lawsuit, according to court documents.

Wells Fargo's defense lawyers even filed an answer to their client's own complaint.

"Defendant admits that it is the owner and holder of a mortgage encumbering the subject real property," the answer reads. "All other allegations of the complaint are denied."



....

Headline appropriated from:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/07/wells-fargo-sues-wells-fargo-wells.html


Original story:

http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/al-lewis-wells-fargo-bank-sues/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reading that made my head hurt.
:crazy:



;)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The best part
you are paying for this nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is what we have become.
I understand the legal reasons that Wells Fargo (first mortgage holder) had filed against Wells Fargo (second mortgage holder)...but this is a perfect example of what is wrong with our society.

Things that have no business making sense now make perfect sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Its amazing that these too big to fail institutions are this insane.
They cannot make a decision internally because there is no head cheese person that can... so, they use legal proceedings because they have no one at the wheel... which is why the economy was driven into a ditch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, it makes a lot of sense.
Any institution that is "too big to fail" and still does obviously doesn't have stellar internal communication.

This (IMO) is just more evidence that 1) some corporations are, actually, too big to be allowed to exist, and 2) our legal system has become convoluted to the point that it often makes no practical sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC