Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I read that CAT had a good last quarter. My stupid question is:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:49 AM
Original message
I read that CAT had a good last quarter. My stupid question is:
is this what is called a "leading indicator" of things to come or is it just what it is, a quarterly report?

I'd really like to know...thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. They beat estimates, but not a good quarter.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Caterpillar-Delivers-prnews-3554008320.html?x=0&.v=1

The above company statement is a pretty clear, no bull quarterly. They deserve a hattip

The second-quarter profit of $371 million was down $735 million from $1.106 billion in the second quarter of 2008. The decline was largely a result of lower sales volume and $85 million of redundancy costs.
<snip>
Sales and revenues of $7.975 billion were down 41 percent from $13.624 billion in the second quarter 2008.
<snip>
The second-quarter profit of $371 million was down $735 million from $1.106 billion in the second quarter of 2008. The decline was largely a result of lower sales volume and $85 million of redundancy costs
<snip>
Our 2009 sales have been hurt by weak end-user demand and significant reductions in dealer inventory. In fact, dealers have reduced their machine inventories by about $1.5 billion through the first half of the year and could reach close to $3 billion by year-end


It's a good indicator....They are hunkering down.

Their sales are way down and profits are off even sharper. Since December they've eliminated 34,000 full-time/contract/temporary positions. (Thus the reason for the $85 million redundancy costs) They stayed in the black by selling off inventory already in the system.

They are not forcing dealers to buy stuff they can't sell (ALA GM and Chrysler) so their dealers reduced inventory and are expected to continue to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks. I appreciate your wisdom here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC