Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former Fed governor: Audit the Fed bill is 'dangerous'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:53 PM
Original message
Former Fed governor: Audit the Fed bill is 'dangerous'
Dec. 1 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Representative Ron Paul’s proposal to allow audits of the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy is “incredibly dangerous” and could stoke inflation, said Frederic Mishkin, a former Fed governor.

“The Ron Paul bill is incredibly dangerous,” said Mishkin, who is now a Columbia University professor, in a Bloomberg Radio interview. “It is remarkable the kind of attacks that are occurring on Fed independence.”

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has opposed the proposal by Paul, a Texas Republican, saying it might open the door to interference in monetary policy. A separate proposal in the Senate backed by Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd would strip the Fed of authority to supervise banks.

Paul’s bill “would be very dangerous in terms of promoting inflation,” Mishkin said. “If you make the central bank beholden to politicians on a short-run basis, you get very bad outcomes: high inflation and less of the ability to deal with shocks like the ones we had recently.”

Bernanke goes before Dodd’s Senate panel Dec. 3 in a confirmation hearing for his second term as central bank chief. He is likely to face questions about the central bank’s record of supervision during the financial crisis and its role in taxpayer-funded rescues of firms including insurer American International Group Inc.

The Fed chairman, in a Nov. 29 commentary in the Washington Post, said curbing the central bank’s authority to supervise the banking system and tampering with its independence would “seriously impair” economic stability in the U.S.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aqUfLCJcZ7Ow&pos=6

----------

It's dangerous to know what the Fed has been doing for so long?

So be it.

This administration promised 'transparency' and it ought to be delivered in some form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. How transparent can they be?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like a threat
Bring it on, banker boy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It IS a threat
The passports for all of the people involved in the finance industry, whether on the industry or the government side, ought to be pulled. They are strip-mining what little wealth is left in this country, they already have their bags packed and their private planes fueled. They are causing a collapse and they know it, but none of that matters as long as they get theirs.

We need to stop them from getting away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Note how they keep repeating this meme of "independence" regarding the Fed
The Fed is not independent, nor has it ever been. It is, essentially, a banking cartel that has control over the nation's money supply. As such, it ensures that the actions it takes benefit bankers first and foremost.

But, apparently they think if they repeat "independence" enough, people will believe it and get scared. Mind you, I'm not crazy about Congress having a great deal of authority over the money supply. But I'm also not so blind to believe that putting it in the hands of the banks is the best way to go about things either -- unless you're a banker, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Pugsley argues that established banks created the Fed to limit competition
Using the argument that the public was often defrauded by charlatans who opened new banks and then fled with depositors' funds or who failed due to lack of sound banking practices, the established banks lobbied for government regulation of the banking industry. Of course, the established banks did not want to be controlled, they just wanted the legal power to make it difficult for new banks to enter the field, and wanted to prevent the banks that did get in from engaging in competitive practices that would affect the established banks' profits. - The Alpha Strategy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. They don't explain WHY it is so dangerous, they just keep saying it will be.
WHY would an audit cause inflation to rise? Doesn't the Fed set interest rates? Are they going to just raise rates because they're being audited? This sounds like blackmail.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, but I think anybody who knows there is such a bill
is aware enough to know only a few men and their fiefdoms are in danger and that an audit followed by nationalization is the best policy.

It's insane to have a central bank in private hands. We need more oversight than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it should be more than just an audit of the Federal Reserve
There should be an audit of all current and past Federal Reserve board members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rats think that rat traps are dangerous
Come to think of it, I'd rather have my basement infested with rats than bankers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC