Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:19 PM
Original message |
My corp. just let it's "poison pill" clause expire. Should I be worried? |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 11:24 PM by Finnfan
For those of you who don't know, the "poison pill" clause apparently limits the vulnerability of a public company to a hostile takeover bid.
My company says that they let this clause expire because (and this is true) they are now the industry leader in their niche. I see their point in a way. None of our competitors would have the resources to launch a hostile takeover bid. My concern is a much, much bigger company (say, a Walmart or a GE), launching such an attack.
Financial experts: Do I have anything to worry about? Are there any other reasons that my employer might have caused this clause to expire?
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's a "poison pill" clause |
|
and it's not necessarily anything to worry about.
Perhaps your company WANTS to be bought, which isn't always bad.
|
Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. In my case, it would be bad. |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 11:25 PM by Finnfan
It's a very, very well-run company. A change in leadership can only be bad, IMO.
On edit: I can't believe I typed "poison bill" not once, but twice!
|
MrSoundAndVision
(879 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
brainshrub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Never trust a large corporation. |
|
Always worry.
If it would make the stock-holders money, a large corporation will hire thugs to rape your wife and chop the arms off your children.
You know what the bastards can do, why do you think they would care about your life?
So I say: Yes. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
|
MrSoundAndVision
(879 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I couldn't care less about the health of any corporation. They are not people, just games, right businessman? Let's work for the health of the nation instead of the health of your numbers, how about that?
|
Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I'm an honestly not asking you to be concerned with the health |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 11:31 PM by Finnfan
of my company. I am merely asking if I should be concerned, since employment is as important to me as it would be to anyone.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I think you shouldn't worry yet |
|
there are many reasons why this could have happened, and not all of them are nefarious.
Perhaps the clause was put into place during a time when they were concerned about something. It could be interpreted as a sign of strength. Lacking any other information, this expiration, by itself, shouldn't be worrisome.
|
Pale Blue Dot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
That's almost verbatim what they said in their press release. :-)
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. do you know the senior management? |
|
Do you trust them? Those are the important questions.
|
rasputin1952
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-02-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Don't worry too much... |
|
leet a little time go by, then you can get a feel of what is happening. It doesn't pay to worry before you have to, just makes you, well, worried.....:)
I hope it all comes out well.
O8)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |