Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mr. Obama’s Missing $1 Trillion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:05 PM
Original message
Mr. Obama’s Missing $1 Trillion
http://247wallst.com/2010/03/08/mr-obamas-missing-1-trillion/

The Congressional Budget Office said the national debt will be rise by $9.8 trillion by 2020. The figure is $1.2 trillion higher than White House estimates, which may put a new sword into the hands of opponents of the current budget.

The CBO estimates are lower than the President’s on both the receipt and expense sides of the ledger. The agency’s numbers assume that current government policies will remain in effect and that discretionary spending will rise at the rate of inflation.

The differences between the White House estimates and those of the CBO are profound when the ten years are added up. US debt held by the public is 67% of GDP under the President’s forecast, but 90% when the CBO estimates are used as the basis of calculations.

The biggest difference between the two sets of projections is that under the President’s plan spending accelerates in the latter part of the decade. The White House plan anticipates expenditures which are $2.3 trillion greater than the estimate offered by the CBO.



more at the above link ---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. You lost me at "Mr. Obama"...I know him as President Obama...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. then complain to the original writer. m/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oops, sorry, my bad...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. and the mnumbers don't add up
If the difference is $1.2T (or even $2.3T) how can the percentage of GDP change from 67% to 90% when we have a CURRENT GDP of 14T+? Even if you assume no GDP grwoth in 10 years you would need a difference of more than $3.5T to represent 23% of GDP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC