Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gee, turns out Congress members who voted for bailout had some stake in the banks.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:26 AM
Original message
Gee, turns out Congress members who voted for bailout had some stake in the banks.
Go figure.

Equity Ownership and Campaign Financing of Members of Congress and the Bailout of the Financial Sector .

"......We find that the equity ownership of members of the House of Representatives, but not the Senate, is positively associated with voting in favor of key legislative proposals to bailout the financial sector.

In a sample of 555 publicly listed financial institutions, we also find that the equity ownership of Congress members seated on the Senate Finance, the House Financial Services and the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs committees is positively associated with both the amount of bailout these institutions receive, as well as the timing of that bailout .

We find that when the chairpersons and ranking members of these committees hold larger investments in a given financial institution, the amount of support committed thereto as well as their likeliness of receiving this support at an earlier time increases.

Keep in mind they are talking about both Dems and Repubs in this report.

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1570219
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. No. You don't say...
I'll bet they have a nice stake in the insurance cos, too. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. NO WAY!..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. it seems like conflict of interest is part of the job qulifiations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unabelladonna Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!
when are we going to hold these swindlers accountable? i really believe in term limits, and it's going to get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. We may chuckle but it's worth pointing out.
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 10:10 AM by DirkGently
... if that had been brought to the fore when the bailout was presented, public pressure might have been swayed. Hell, I believed them when they said the world would end if we didn't so something, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't think anyone here is chuckling
I know I'm not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ours is a grim, knowing chuckle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Reality sucks, don't it? Just a game of musical chairs in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crewleader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. you got that right my friend....
out with the old and bring in the new,let's clean house every election! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. So just to play devils advocate
You woulda let the banks and financial institutions go under? Pension plans, 401ks, IRAs? Isn't it safe to say everyone had a stake in that bailout?

Not that I like it. I don't. I think we should have fired all the failures running the big banks and financial firms, and nationalized them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Hey "devil"..
.. the banks are still insolvent. The bailout money is going to fake profits and bonuses. The banks are eventually going to fail anyway.

There is no "other side" to this argument, a debt crisis like ours can only be solved one way and the bailouts simply kick the can and make the eventual end all that much more painful.

And yes, anyone with a pension, be it corporate or state/local govt should be worried. There is a very good chance will collect only some of what you were promised and some chance you will not collect anything. Bankruptcies generally wipe out pensions.

The facts suck but they cannot be obviated by the crooks who are merely playing a game of "let's keep this ball afloat until all of us insiders can walk away whole".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I know
If we nationalize them it is the only chance that ordinary people will ever see any of their pension or savings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. and this is surprising because . . . ? n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC