Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Largest Gain U.S. Wholesale Inventories Since NOV 99, Jobs proj only 4 yrs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:08 AM
Original message
Largest Gain U.S. Wholesale Inventories Since NOV 99, Jobs proj only 4 yrs
and $2 triilion in additional National Debt to get back to Clinton's 62% of workforce working.

And that is with 308,000 increase in payrolls every monthe for 48 months.

At the GOP projection of 175,000 to 200,000 new jobs each month next 3 months , and if that rate continues for next decade - it will be closer to 7 or more years.

It will take near forever to recover from the Bush tax cut for the rich disaster.

But at least the inventories gain will get first quarter GDP rate of gain over 4%.

And it is pre-election numbers that really matter - impressions - that our media can sell - not reality.

:grr:

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Missing 9.4 million Jobs - This Says It All
http://www.comstockfunds.com/index.cfm?act=Newsletter.cfm&category=Mar ...

Comstock Funds
Charlie Minter
7 April 2004

Although the 308,000 increase in March payroll employment may seem like a lot compared to what we’ve been getting and what most have been expecting, it actually falls far short of what we should be seeing at this stage of a recovery. Here’s what we found in examining the last seven economic recoveries.

In the first six of these recoveries beginning with May 1954 employment rose by an average of 7.7 percent over the first 28 months with a high of 9.1 percent and a low of 5.5 percent. This includes one cycle that peaked in 24 months with a gain of 7.4 percent. Even in the recovery that started in March 1991, employment climbed 2.2% over the first 28 months. For all of the seven recoveries, employment rose by an average of 6.9 percent over 28 months. So let’s not hear any more about employment being a lagging indicator. It is not, and even if it were, 28 months is surely enough time to catch up.

In the current recovery employment has actually declined 0.2 percent in the first 28 months that includes the March number and the revisions that were released on Friday. If employment had increased by 6.9 percent, the average of the past recoveries, March payrolls would have come to about 139.9 million rather than the 130.5 million actually reported. This means that there are now 9.4 million fewer jobs than there should be at this point in the cycle, and that we needed an average increase of 322,000 jobs for each of the past 28 months to equal the average job growth of the last seven expansions.

Snip ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep - but the media sells Bush as the optimist - and Bush sells low
expectations!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. When The Economy Is Dysfunctional Optimism Is Meaningless
Unemployed 46 Months!

Optimism doesn't put food on the family!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC