Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Senate Says No to "Clean Coal" & Nuclear in RPS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:41 PM
Original message
U.S. Senate Says No to "Clean Coal" & Nuclear in RPS
http://www.renewableaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=48960

National Renewable Energy Portfolio (RPS) legislation introduced by Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM), which included clean coal technology and nuclear power alongside traditional sources of renewable energy, was voted down in the U.S. Senate this afternoon 56-29.

Domenici, ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, introduced an amendment yesterday to establish a National Clean Portfolio Standard (CPS) as an alternative to a proposal introduced by Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM). Bingaman's amendment calls for a National Renewable Portfolio (RPS) requiring 15 percent of electricity generated in the U.S. to come from renewables by 2020.

The legislation proposed by Domenici, which was co-authored by Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho), expanded the standard to 20 percent as well as included clean coal technology and nuclear power—and argued it would bring more states into the clean energy fold.

"If we insist on forcing electricity generators to reach specific targets on the use of clean energy sources, then let's make sure we allow all clean sources to be considered," said Domenici yesterday addressing the U.S. Senate.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great news! Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fazoolius_2006 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. How is this great news?
Shouldn't we be using more nuclear energy? Heck France is using 90+% nuclear energy. Wouldn't this also reduce our dependence on foreign oil? I am all for working to do my part to be energy efficient, but fighting against nuclear energy seems counter productive to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No, it won't reduce our dependence on foreign oil
France - about 78% of their electricity is nuclear.
They import oil, just like us.
They went with nuclear for electricity because they didn't have much coal.
We don't use oil for electricity, we use coal - we are the Saudi Arabia of coal.

"France's annual oil demand so much outstrips its annual production that more than 95% of its needs are met by imports ... this has made France the world's fifth-greatest net oil importer"
http://www.cslforum.org/france.htm

For solving global warming, there are better solutions than new nuclear plants.
Al Gore talked about it in his policy address: http://nyu.edu/community/gore.html
He also spent a whole day discussing these issues before the house and senate: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x480960

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting.. Good news.

Have a donut. :donut: :donut: :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC