|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 09:36 AM Original message |
Poll question: Weigh in... with the nuclear power straw poll! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
1. The only thing I have against nuclear power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HonorTheConstitution (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 09:46 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Sorry, but on an international level nuclear power has killed less people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 09:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. It's safer than everything else. Everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
52. unsafe: uranium mining, energy production, nuclear waste storage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:46 AM Response to Reply #52 |
60. Nonsense. All of those things are done safely every day. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #60 |
113. Please tell us all about the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #113 |
116. Wasn't as safe in the PAST. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #116 |
120. Is uranium mining, milling, transport, conversion and enrichment "safe" today??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #120 |
123. You realize Uranium is weakly radioactive right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
appal_jack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. unless they are in your lungs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #124 |
130. And there are processes to mitigate that hazard. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 11:23 AM Response to Reply #123 |
134. Please tell us about the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act and the thousands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
2. We need a new National Mandate for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 09:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. One unwritten assumption of my poll is: technologies that are mature today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
6. Oh think of the potential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I am much more concerned with *actual* devastation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I know, what a huge mystery!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
61. Do you know how many people coal-based power has killed today? 26 just today in the US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. We are lucky that the First Energy plants never poured radioactive water into Lake Erie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. The Palo Verde nuclear plant, near here, uses treated sewage for coolant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. The condenser water is an isolated system from the radioactive water in the reactor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Too late to worry about drug testing those welders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
63. I think it's a knee-jerk reaction to the word "nuclear." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Mandatory drug testing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Just think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. yes, yes, all those damned dirty hippies, high as shit. back in the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 06:16 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. What about kids living within 2 metres of sea-level? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Conservation will do them good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
9. Does it matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
11. A vote with a caveat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. speaking of that, I had secretly hoped that you would have something to say about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-17-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
12. a kick for straw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
21. Its too late for peak oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 08:42 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Yes, PO is a much more urgent problem than GW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. It does raise an interesting question: what does an economy look like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. It's an intersting thought experiment, but has low real-world value |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I'm not completely sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. That's a fundamental difference in our outlook |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-18-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I wouldn't call myself a gradualist.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
106. Electric Cars. The technology is there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-19-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
29. Sure, I'll have a helping of nuclear dust with my veggies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
30. European study concludes more than 66 million dead from nukes since 1945 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Or, maybe I sould say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Well, if you don't know what you're talking about, make stuff up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 08:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Ooh -- it sounds ever so official and scientific! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:16 AM Response to Reply #30 |
68. That is the single most stupid thing that I've ever read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
33. Wikipedia says about Nevada as a testing ground..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. That's the only source of nuclear fallout? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:40 PM Response to Reply #33 |
117. Simple Question to you: Where do you logically put waste? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
35. Pigwidgeon said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. It decays to background in about 300-1000 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 10:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Pigwidgeon says... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Chiggerbit is interested in recycling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 10:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. And by "recycle"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. That's where most DU comes from. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:02 AM Response to Reply #40 |
65. Nonsense. The two have nothing to do with each other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #37 |
47. Horseshit. The National Academy of Science suggested maybe a million years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:05 AM Response to Reply #47 |
66. The NAS is mistaken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 06:37 AM Response to Reply #66 |
80. How convincing! You repeat your canard and add "The NAS is mistaken" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:37 AM Response to Reply #80 |
93. The most highly radioactive isotopes decay the quickest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #93 |
127. And so different scenarios give the maximum exposure at different time scales |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 12:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
101. If you bothered to actually look at the data, you'd see that I'm right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. You'll wait a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Most Anti's don't have a clue about Nuclear Reactors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. The Ocean changed my mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Talk about a nicely mixed metaphor. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #101 |
126. It's not a matter of my information being bad, but of your failure to understand what the NAS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:18 AM Response to Reply #47 |
69. The horse is all yours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 06:10 AM Response to Reply #69 |
78. No, I quoted "Physics Today" reporting on a court case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
39. Again, Pigwidgeon says... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Please clarify that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Well, my math's not so good...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 01:02 AM Response to Reply #39 |
49. here's a use for that nuclear waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. I'm anti-war. If you are pro-war, you're on your own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:30 AM Response to Reply #54 |
58. well it's already happening in case you didn't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #58 |
88. DU is not spent fuel from reactors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. I know that, read what I said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:31 AM Response to Reply #90 |
99. Ooops, sorry, you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-21-07 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
45. Reports of blue flash studied.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
46. Every hour, enough solar radiation hits the earth to power the entire planet for a year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Like It Is (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
48. Waste disposal is the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 01:03 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. And uranium mining too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
51. Nuclear is too dangerous -- period. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
53. It's all about the OPTIONS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
55. This poll has been TROLLED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hankthecrank (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:29 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Thanks for the good links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:45 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. It's a conspiracy to promote abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hankthecrank (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:49 AM Response to Reply #59 |
62. I like the board you gave me links too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:58 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Knock yourself out, Hank |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hankthecrank (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:34 AM Response to Reply #64 |
72. Sorry used up all my electrons can't write them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:09 AM Response to Reply #55 |
67. Sweet fancy Moses, what a weird and crazy site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:24 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. They only come out at night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 05:43 AM Response to Reply #70 |
76. Right,, sure, uh huh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 06:01 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. So where DID the "66 million" come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 06:35 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Deleted message |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 07:45 AM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Ahhh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 09:56 AM Response to Reply #77 |
84. Deleted message |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #55 |
83. I expected this a lot sooner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 06:00 PM Response to Reply #55 |
87. Even with polling-Hessians, they haven't quite cracked 50%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
91. Na, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 01:01 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Deleted message |
Nihil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:03 AM Response to Reply #55 |
96. Ick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 05:02 AM Response to Reply #96 |
98. Aww, but they're cute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 12:01 PM Response to Reply #96 |
102. wrong reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
56. Interesting read on effects.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmboxer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:28 AM Response to Original message |
71. Solar All the way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
73. I voted "Convinced against..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #73 |
85. Show me your math for geothermal, solar, tidal, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. I answered your question fairly. You answer mine now: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:49 AM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Try here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:51 AM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Gee, who here has the college PhD do unravel that math??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:49 AM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Deleted sub-thread |
Esra Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 04:48 AM Response to Original message |
74. We have to address our energy profligacy. I am distressed when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-22-07 05:15 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Uranium supply: almost forever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #75 |
111. The US would have to process 7000+ cubic kilometers of seawater each year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:42 PM Response to Reply #111 |
118. The beauty is that you can make new fuel. Plutonium. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Breeder reactors do not work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #111 |
121. Compared to millions of windmills, it's small stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #121 |
135. There are 3.5 grams/L of salt in seawater and only 3.3 micro-grams/L of uranium |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. 200 km^3 a day. We probably do that now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. 200 cubic kilometers per day??? You've got to be kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #138 |
140. No pie, but blue skies for nuclear energy AND de-sal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
100. This is the most popular post I ever did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
103. Nihil said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. I think that's a fair point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. I have no problem there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #109 |
115. I thought what you found was very juicy. This poll provoked quite a reaction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #115 |
122. That's a good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
losthills (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dead_Parrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. Err, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VTMechEngr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 08:37 PM Response to Reply #125 |
129. Now that is full of shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 04:05 AM Response to Reply #103 |
133. ... but chiggerbit said ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 11:38 AM Response to Reply #133 |
136. We're talking about two things here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lakeguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #103 |
147. i think you meant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
112. The key to this is going to be financing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chiggerbit (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
114. Actually, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
131. Here, I'll let these guys speak for me why I am AGAINST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-23-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. Your link is a hit piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 07:49 PM Response to Reply #132 |
141. Kill the messenger....where have I heard that before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. What was that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-25-07 11:46 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. Where to start...lets use your own words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-26-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. "My feeling is this thread is flamebait and little more." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-27-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #145 |
146. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 01:01 PM Response to Reply #146 |
148. I thought it was funny, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #148 |
151. Attention fish in barrel: meet stick o dynamite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 06:23 AM Response to Reply #151 |
152. Your last post said it all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hankthecrank (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 02:16 PM Response to Reply #131 |
139. I like your links good info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-24-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #139 |
142. Thanks for the support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
149. I'm shocked that a board such as this has a poll with these results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 06:28 AM Response to Reply #149 |
153. That's the whole point. Why is it *bad*? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-28-07 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
150. Well scanning through this thread and reading what I could digest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-30-07 09:29 AM Response to Reply #150 |
154. Some responses. No flames, no rancor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC