Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dangerous fossil fuel explosion in NY may cost 100's of millions in direct costs.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:09 PM
Original message
Dangerous fossil fuel explosion in NY may cost 100's of millions in direct costs.

NEW YORK - With the cleanup from a deadly steam pipe explosion expected to drag on for days, businesses in the "frozen zone" could lose hundreds of millions of dollars, a business leader said Friday.

The neighborhood just south of Grand Central Terminal is one of the nation's most expensive commercial districts, home to corporate headquarters including Pfizer Inc., real estate firm Newmark Knight Frank and magazine publisher Meredith Corp. The blast killed one person, a woman who worked at Pfizer.

"There is a significant loss for those in the frozen area," said Kathryn Wylde, president of Partnership for New York City, a nonprofit organization of city business leaders.

"If it goes much farther than next week, the potential losses in revenue could be in the hundreds of millions of dollars."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070720/ap_on_re_us/manhattan_explosion

Situation grave...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was a steam explosion - not a fossil fuel explosion
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 05:23 PM by jpak
n/t

on edit:

Deadly nuclear fuel explosion kills at least 4 at Japanese nuclear plant

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/09/tech/main634673.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So the Steam Fairy generated this steam for Con Ed?
:rofl:

And how many people have died from polluted air due to fossil fuel burning this year? :think:
Or maybe coal mining accidents? :think:
Or what about those refinery accidents? :think:
Or maybe it just hurts too much to :think:? :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Perhaps it was...
the steampunk fairies:

.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Fucking nutcases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Why do you hate faeries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thanks for the laugh and the ear-to-ear grin.
Nicest thing anyone's said about me in a long while, once the context of the thing is factored in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. A steam leak accident from three years ago
You're really stretching now.

Wave of deathly horcrux-related accidents stymie muggles, boffins, granfaloons.

I prefer magical self-heating metal, myself.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You mean it was a solar steam accident?
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 08:59 PM by NNadir
I don't think so.

Solar energy is a trivial form of commercial energy and quite obviously could never support even a fraction of the energy requirements of the City of New York. As it happens, I was in New York today and I saw zero solar steam generators. Why? Because there are none.

It would appear that you have never heard of the first law of thermodynamics. Since you apparently are unaware of this law, let me help you. According to Wikipedia - and yes it is easy to look up the laws of thermodynamics if you know zero about them - the first law can be written like this: "The increase in the internal energy of a thermodynamic system is equal to the amount of heat energy added to the system minus the work done by the system on the surroundings."

This is just one way of stating this important universal law.

In case you still don't get it, this means that the heat in the steam came from somewhere. Where would place be? Well, it happens that on earth there are only a few sources of primary energy: Solar energy, fossil energy (which was originally solar energy), and nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is available in the form of geothermal energy and nuclear fission energy. Solar energy is usually transformed using solar PV cells (a trivial practice on earth), hydroelectric energy (a major practice on earth) and wind energy (still small but growing.)

Since it is necessary to give you rudimentary lessons in physics, I might add that since solar energy is derived from nuclear energy, there is actually only one form of primary energy on earth.

So what's your guess about where the energy came from?

We know that it wasn't nuclear steam, because if it were, you'd be all over it like a fly on shit. You would never stop talking about this accident.

Ever.

But as it is, you declare this accident trivial, so we immediately know that we can eliminate the possibility that nuclear energy was involved in any way.

It is not surprising that we have to cover such rudimentary points. I have always felt that you knew almost nothing about physics.

If I recall, just yesterday you were telling us that this steam accident in New York was different than the events because the accident in New York would have few economic implications.

I quote you directly:



The comparison is stupid because a major earthquake severely damaged and disabled the world's largest nuclear plant complex.

This accident - which is still being assessed - will cost TEPCO and TEPCO customers lots and lots of money (millions??? billions??? no one knows).

It has shaken the confidence of the Japanese people in their government and their plans to build more nuclear power plants.

The pipe burst in Manhattan is peanuts by comparison...


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=104389&mesg_id=104425

It seems that your knowledge of economics is comparable to your knowledge of the laws of thermodynamics in particular and physics in general.

In another thread, I offered a report that the implications of the New York accident will involve trillions of dollars:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=104566&mesg_id=104566

You couldn't care less.

Why couldn't you care less? Because you routinely exhibit selective attention and routinely apply criteria in a way that is arbitrary and hypocritical and is solely intended to support your irrational biases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. and you are the only 'smart' one around here I take it, what a loon
I do start my ignore list today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Cool. You can put climate-change and peak-fossil on your ignore list while you're at it.
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 10:37 AM by phantom power
I'm sure that will make them cease to exist, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I wasn't addressing that, I was addressing the poster. jeeeeze
I made no mention of fossil fuels climate change or any of that. I was talking about how the said poster talks down to everybody like he is the teacher or something, I don't need to hear that shit here on du of all places. talks to me like I just fell off the roof this morning cause I was too damn dumb to sleep anywhere else and then jumb up and run off through the fields across the valley up the hill jump a few stumps along the way, after all we are stump jumpers aren't we, and then circle back home to take a shit in the front yard is what I was talking about. I'm as worried about our future as anybody else is, I have a vested interest in it afterall. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. You are very good at ignoring things. It shows in your writings.
For instance you ignore dangerous fossil fuels and couldn't care if they killed 100 million people.

You may think you're just starting at ignoring things, but it is clear that you are very old hand at it.

Etymologically, by the way, the roots of the words "ignore" and "ignorance" are precisely the same. That seems worthy of statement for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. It's $1.6 Trillion for infrastructure improvements countrywide,not $Trillions in Manhattan for steam
Edited on Sun Jul-22-07 10:30 AM by TheBorealAvenger
...pipe repairs, you blustering blowhard.

From your very own post that you cited: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=104566&mesg_id=104566

...The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates that it will take $1.6 trillion over the next five years to get the nation's roads, bridges, dams, water systems and airports into good condition...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fucking nutcase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. How analytical of you! Did you get that directly from Al Gore or did you think of it by yourself?
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 09:01 PM by NNadir
Let me guess...

You thought of it yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Wow! I'm convinced! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think the point jpak and others are making ...
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 02:22 PM by HamdenRice
is that the accident was not related to fuel used to generate the steam. Manhattan's energy system is unusual because Con Ed not only distributes electricity, but also distributes the steam it generates in its boilers after the steam has done the work of turning the electical turbines. Manhattan is said to have the largest steam distribution system in the world, and buildings and businesses use the steam for heating, air conditioning, sterilization, cleaning and other purposes. (That's why the stereotypical image of NYC in films usually involves steam rising from a manhole cover -- either steam from rainwater hitting the hot underground steam pipes or leaks in the steam pipe system.)

If the steam had been generated by nuclear, solar or any other source, the explosion would still have occurred. The explosion in the steam delivery system, not in the power generation plant, appears to have been caused because a very old steam pipe failed after very heavy rains -- not because of the type of fuel used.

It wasn't the fossil fuel that exploded. It was a steam distribution pipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I think the point that JPak and others is making is that they are arbitrary.
In fact, JPak was all over this space this week freaking out about a transformer fire.

Why?

Because the transformer was next to a nuclear plant.

It wasn't a nuclear plant that caught fire but part of a subsystem that is typical of all power plants, nuclear, fossil fuel, or otherwise. You won't hear JPak say that.

The steam in this system was part of a fossil fuel plant, a plant that it functionally integrated to a system in New York City that burns dangerous fossil fuels and distributes dangerous fossil fuel waste.

I note that if a steam pipe leaked in a nuclear plant, JPak would pretend that it was the worst energy disaster of the year, even if, as was the case at the KK plant, zero people were killed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. ROFL! I'm not going there!
I don't post in this forum that often so I have no idea what the deal is between you and Jpak or what your underlying dispute is, so I'm afraid I have to say, I'm not going there. But I feel ya, there are some DUers I have relationships with that are comparable to whatever is going on here.

My only point is that the explosion in NYC had nothing to do with fossil fuel. It was a steam pipe explosion and NYC is very dependent on the distribution of steam energy. It wasn't a "Dangerous fossil fuel explosion" at all; it was a steam explosion. The explosion wasn't even near the power plant and it's fuel supply, which is in the far east side, on the East River, while the explosion was near Grand Central Terminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. NNadir has an agenda to promote nuclear power but his messaging is really bad
He has a paranoid thesis that the media and DUers over hype any nuclear problem and ignore fossil-fuel and coal fired problems in particular. Coal fired electricity creates "externalized costs" of lung disease and environmental destruction that don't play out that sensationally.

He cannot seem to debate people without becoming insulting, denigrating, and profane. Really bad messaging. If there are deleted messages on threads about nukes in this forum, they were probably his. Note that I have only hit the alert button once in the last month.

Sorry that you cannot learn much in this forum on account of the dry messages and innuendo. I would suggest the links in my sig line for something better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. There are a few in the 9/11 Forum
who have the same problem with messaging. If anyone so much as questions the official story, they heap invective, ridicule, and insults on that person.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Sorry - you are making things up again (as usual)
Show us one post where I "freaked out about a transformer fire".

(clue: you can't, I never did, you made it up)

Strawman #2 is made up as well...

"I note that if a steam pipe leaked in a nuclear plant, JPak would pretend that it was the worst energy disaster of the year, even if, as was the case at the KK plant, zero people were killed."

FYI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. I didn't think it was that unusual.
A number of cities have district energy systems, although New York City has the largest steam distribution system. I am working on a chilled water and heating water district system right now. The operator of the central plant sells energy to the various customers in the form of chilled water or heating water (we don't use steam much here in southern Arizona).

The wikipedia article on district heating also has some information on district cooling, including a mention of the new Toronto system that uses lake water as chilled water. The photo on the right at the top of the article looks like the work I'm doing right now, except that I have four runs of piping in the trench instead of two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yes NYC is unusual for its size
Other areas also have systems for distributing used steam. It's that NYC has had the system is so large and has been around so long that it is a pervasive part of our energy infrastructure. To put it another way, other cities may be constructing these systems or have recently constructed them; but the steam distribution system in NY was here before most of the currently existing modern buildings were, which means that the use of steam infrastructure was built into them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yes, it is the biggest and oldest (IIRC).
So if that's what you mean by unusual then I agree. But a number of district energy systems were built prior to the buildings that are served by them, including the one I am working on. The systems don't have to be as old as the NYC one - most modern buildings in the U.S. have been built within the last thirty years or so.

I have had to convert buildings over to a centralized system and it is a royal pain in the ass, especially if steam is involved, but it does happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I used to work in finance
Edited on Sun Jul-22-07 12:36 PM by HamdenRice
and did a few "project finance" deals involving power plants in the 1990s. By then, "cogeneration" or the sale of the heat in addition to the electricity, was by then already a big part of the economics of power plant financing.

But I've never figured out how steam was used to produce air conditioning. I suppose some things will remain a mystery to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Cogen is very nice.
The central plant for the project I am working on uses cogen - the waste heat from the generator feeds an absorption chiller, which is a way of producing chilled water from heat. I'm not at work so I don't have access to all the books that explain how this works (and I don't understand it very well myself) but tomorrow I'll try to rustle up a quick explanation if you're interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC