Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Green groups sue U.S. government to stop coal plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 04:16 PM
Original message
Green groups sue U.S. government to stop coal plant
http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN2338210820070724

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Green groups said they filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to stop a U.S. government office from funding the building of a coal-fired power station until it discloses the global warming impacts of the plant.

The Rural Utilities Service, a Great Depression-era program to bring power to rural areas, agreed in May to fund the majority of the $720 million, 250-megawatt Highwood Generating Station near Great Falls, Montana. The office is considering helping to fund billions more for an additional six coal-fired power plants from Wyoming to Kentucky.

The suit was filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by environmental law firm Earthjustice, green group the Sierra Club and others. It claims RUS broke federal environmental laws by not disclosing the impacts of the Montana plant and that it did not consider other power generation sources such as wind power before moving ahead with funding for it.

The suit seeks to stop the office, part of the Department of Agriculture, from approving federal loan funds for the plants until it confronts the global warming impacts of coal burning. The loan rates would be about 2 percentage points lower than commercial rates.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. That reminds me of a thing I heard on NPR.
A discussion about requiring businesses (particularly power generation) to publish estimates of their carbon footprint. They said it's required in Britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank God for Earthjustice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And the Sierra Club!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Sierra Club has no serious program to displace fossil fuels.
They are better doing the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tortilla_Curtain">Tortilla Curtain game.

The Sierra Club has consistently opposed the only exajoule scale form of continuous energy that is demonstrated as an alternative to coal fired plants. Since they have not called for a coal phase out, or produced a single document suggesting a rational industrial procedure for doing so, one can only assume that they couldn't care less about coal.

Mostly they do this "by 2050" mindless crap and very little else:

http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/releases/pr2007-01-31a.asp

Note that even the "2050" strategy (and most people now living will not be there to check up on how stupid it was) speaks only in vague percentages - even that with a huge fraction of the energy supply still derived from fossil fuels.

It has never occurred to the members of the modern Sierra Club as far as I can tell that "lighting up the border" will require energy.

Unknown to the Sierra Club, climate change will not take place in 2050. It is happening now. I thought everybody knew that, but apparently not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If you are anti-Sierra Club - you are pro-coal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. A boy has never wept, nor dashed a thousand kin.
--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. "60-80% emissions reductions by 2050"
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 05:21 AM by Dead_Parrot
= Fucked.

Too little, too late.

It's sad that Dave Hamilton thinks this is "a destination", but not really a surprise.

"We can reduce carbon emissions by 1,100-1,200 million metric tons annually by 2030 with aggressive deployment of energy efficiency and renewable energy alone"
:rofl:
Pity about the other 11,000,000,000 tons. But hey, it's renewable. Doubleplus good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Right now, they're the only ones getting coal plants stopped
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Neither does the Nuclear Energy Institute, Excelon, The Southern Co., Duke Power or Westinghouse
(all participants in Dick Cheney's Energy Task Farce)

There are $12 billion in CheneyBucks for new nuclear plants.

None are currently under construction...and none of the proposed new nuclear plants will replace an existing coal-fired plant or result in the cancellation of a proposed coal-fired plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. "Sierra Club, Congressmen, Dr. James Hansen, Energy Experts Unveil Energy Report"
The trolls are trying to discredit James Hansen now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, it's a start ...
... though a very limited one if you actually read it ...

> Green groups said they filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to stop
> a U.S. government office from funding the building of a coal-fired
> power station until it discloses the global warming impacts of the plant.

In other words, they are not trying to stop the construction of this
small (250MW) coal-fired generator, they are not trying to block the
use of federal fund for coal permanently (just temporarily), they are
not placing any conditions on the factual content of the "disclosure"
that will allow the status quo to be restored ... they are just putting
a tiny, tiny stake in the ground (in case the coal industry decides to
stomp them with the costs for delaying a project).

Still, great oaks from little acorns grow (only to be chopped down and
burned in someone's stove or smoked into BBQ charcoal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. They got the TXU coal plants stopped
Right now, these environmental groups are the only ones getting coal plants stopped.
They are on the front lines - and the pro-nukes shoot them in the back.
Heckuva job, nukies!

http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=sierra+club+txu+coal&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Web Results 1 - 10 of about 66,700 for sierra club txu coal. (0.10 seconds)

Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club(Austin, TX) – The Sierra Club has achieved party status in contested case hearings on six TXU permit applications to build and operate coal-fired power ...
texas.sierraclub.org/press/newsreleases/20061211.asp - 17k - Cached - Similar pages

Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club(Austin)--A Texas Sierra Club spokesperson today celebrated the cancellation of eight proposed TXU coal plants as a victory that resulted from the ...
texas.sierraclub.org/press/newsreleases/20070226.asp - 16k - Cached - Similar pages
< More results from texas.sierraclub.org >

Stop The Coal RushThe event was funded by contributions from Sierra Club members and other individuals ... “The cancellation of eight proposed TXU coal plants is certainly a ...
www.stopthecoalrush.com/ - 40k - Cached - Similar pages

Stop The Coal Rush » Thousands Rally at the State Capitol to “Stop ...Kudos to our MCs – Ann Drumm, Chair of the Dallas Sierra Club and Sam Canup, .... “The cancellation of eight proposed TXU coal plants is certainly a victory ...
www.stopthecoalrush.com/2007/03/13/ thousands-rally-at-the-state-capitol-to-“stop-the-coal-rush”/ - 25k - Cached - Similar pages
< More results from www.stopthecoalrush.com >

Coal Rush Plants :: Sierra ClubThis case is a part of a consolidated docket in which the Sierra Club is opposing six proposed TXU coal fired plants. If constructed, these new units will ...
www.sierraclub.org/environmentallaw/coal/plantlist.asp - 235k - Cached - Similar pages

Electric Utility, Sierra Club End Dispute - washingtonpost.comThe Sierra Club and Kansas City Power & Light Co. have signed an unusual accord ... would shelve eight of the 11 coal-fired plants on TXU's drawing boards. ...
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ content/article/2007/03/19/AR2007031901606.html - Similar pages

Lone Star Chapter, Sierra ClubRead the coal report at www.sierraclub.org/coal/dirtytruth/report. ... decision by the TCEQ commissioners on a 2-1 vote to permit TXU's huge Oak Grove coal ...
www.lonestar.sierraclub.org/ press/newsreleases/20070621.asp - 15k - Cached - Similar pages

Sierra Club joins coal plant lawsuit - Dallas Business Journal:Sierra Club joins coal plant lawsuit, ... six separate pending TXU permits into one administrative docket," the Sierra Club says in its petition. ...
dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/ stories/2006/12/25/daily16.html - 98k - Cached - Similar pages

Cool Cities NowFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Sierra Club and the American. Lung Association, the rally. called on lawmakers to support. a time out on permits for the. new plants. The TXU coal ...
newjersey.sierraclub.org/ ConCom/CoolCities/CoolCitiesNow2.pdf - Similar pages

Activists Successful In Stopping What Some Call The TXU "Coal Rush"Cancellation of Eight TXU Coal Plants ... The victory has been celebrated by many, but the Sierra Club raised concerns that state officials may now think ...
ktvt.iewatershed.com/index. php?pagename=news_070328_coal - 19k - Cached - Similar pages

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC