Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America's Amazing Sinking Energy Infrastructure - Port Fourchon, LA - Fortune

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 05:07 PM
Original message
America's Amazing Sinking Energy Infrastructure - Port Fourchon, LA - Fortune
EDIT

There are countless more for companies such as Shell (Charts), Chevron (Charts, Fortune 500), and BP (Charts). All told, the pipelines at Fourchon connect to half of the refining capacity in this country. And they're a key stem in a broader branching of pipelines in southern Louisiana, which combine to transport 27 percent of America's oil and 30 percent of its natural gas. If the port seems like a mirage on the edge of the marsh, that may be because its permanence is anything but assured. The port sits in a region that, although it escaped the most cataclysmic destruction of Katrina and Rita, is being ravaged by two slow-moving but equally ruinous phenomena: erosion and the sinking of the land.

Some 25 square miles of Louisiana have been collapsing into the gulf each year for three-quarters of a century. A total of 1,900 square miles, roughly the area of Delaware, disappeared between the 1930s and 2005, and another 217 square miles were pulverized into liquid by Katrina and Rita. And that land loss, says Ted Falgout, who has run Port Fourchon for 28 years, poses a growing threat not only to the people who live here but also to the U.S. energy supply. "We're on a train wreck here," says Falgout. "We have not designed the energy infrastructure - or any infrastructure - ."

The problem afflicts all of southern Louisiana. As land turns to water, it is exposing thousands of miles of oil and gas pipelines that were built underground and were not designed to withstand water or waves. "There are places where a pipeline that was laid in marsh, well protected, is now in five or six feet of water - in an open bay that is subject to a vessel coming across and hitting it," says Falgout. "That's the thing that are spending their money on right now. It's so huge that they're just putting out fires."

Most energy and pipeline companies seem loath to discuss the issue, but there are signs of anxiety. "The pipeline companies are very - I don't want to say nervous - they're very concerned," says Clifford Smith, chairman of T. Baker Smith, an engineering firm that has been designing and servicing pipelines in Louisiana since 1913. "We're constantly doing what we call as-builts" - inspections of existing pipelines - "and remedial work," he says. "Accidents are happening because of the changes in topography. It's a big thing."

EDIT

http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/02/magazines/fortune/no_energycrisis.fortune/?postversion=2007080611
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The wetlands that made south LA build up rather than sink
have been destroyed by the channelization of Big Muddy, loss of sediment inflow, and building the canals that let saltwater into freshwater marshes and killed off all the vegetation.

The wetlands there CAN be restored, but I doubt the oil and gas industry will allow it. They run things down there. They have no one to blame for their fix but themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. actually they want it done.
they need the wetlands to keep their pipes from being exposed and thus losing stability. katrina knocked the crap out of the platforms distribution lines on the seabed and lines on the land. if another storm hits before they can rebuild the lines they will lose there pipelines. it would be a very cold winter in the heartland of the usa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They may want it done, now that they see the damage they have
caused to their own infrastructure. They should be made to pay for 100% of the remediation, and ordered to complete the job in 5 years, IMHO. But THAT will never happen. We taxpayers and whatever private charities pitch in will have to foot the bill. The criminals won't pay a dime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. rebuilding the wetlands/delta would
cost about three or fours months that we are spending in iraq...

the river is the life blood of the this country and without it our nation will whither on the vine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC