Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Environmental Leaders React To APEC: "Meaningless" "Stunt" "Irrelevant" "Sideshow" - AFP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-09-07 09:03 PM
Original message
Environmental Leaders React To APEC: "Meaningless" "Stunt" "Irrelevant" "Sideshow" - AFP
EDIT

Climate change topped the agenda at this weekend's Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Sydney, its 21 members agreeing to long-term goals but failing to set binding targets in areas such as greenhouse gas emissions. Australian Prime Minister John Howard described it as "a very important milestone" toward a future global agreement that drew in both rich and poor countries.

Activists were not impressed, talking of a political stunt to promote an agreement that lacked any teeth. "Without legally binding targets for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions the Sydney Declaration is meaningless and irrelevant in addressing climate change," Greenpeace Southeast Asia energy campaigner Abigail Jabines said. "It is a political stunt. Developing nations of the Asia Pacific region cannot afford to accept lip service instead of action."

EDIT

Julie-Anne Richards, from the Climate Action Network Australia, said that environmentalists were looking to a UN-brokered meeting in Bali in December for progress on climate change because the APEC statement meant nothing. "The world doesn't have time for voluntary action, what we need is real action, real targets and real timetables," she said.

There was biting criticism too from the Los Angeles Times, which said the "aspirational" Sydney statement was political theatre designed to boost Howard's green credentials before the conservative leader faces an election later this year. "For aspirational, read: voluntary, vague and useless for anything but padding a fading prime minister's environmental resume," it said in an online editorial.

EDIT/END

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070909/sc_afp/apecsummitclimate_070909062524;_ylt=AjmnQh4c4WB67o6xIonwf3VrAlMA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC