Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top 10 most polluted sites.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 05:48 AM
Original message
Top 10 most polluted sites.
Nice to see that an American based company is responsible for at least one of the sites. :eyes: The article says that most, if not all of these sites, could be cleaned with relatively cost-effective measures.

Sumqayit in Azerbaijan gained the dubious distinction this week of being added to Blacksmith Institute's top 10 list of the world's most polluted sites. Yet another heir to the toxic legacy of Soviet industry, the city of 275,000 souls bears heavy metal, oil and chemical contamination from its days as a center of chemical production. As a result, local Azeris suffer cancer rates 22 to 51 percent higher than their countrymen and their children suffer from a host of genetic defects ranging from mental retardation to bone diseases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why isn't Freeperville on that list?
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think they excluded Freeperville
because what is polluted there are minds. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What a Superfund cesspool _that_ is.
Kickin' again. Why dintcha post this in GD? Or did I miss it?

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I thought it was more relevant here
But in retrospect, it would have received much needed exposure. Thanks for kickin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hanford didn't make the list?
These other places must be absolutely stunningly horrid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hanford and New Orleans were nominated
and included in the rest of the list- but didn't make the top 10.

Here's the full report: http://www.blacksmithinstitute.org/top10/10worst1.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I read most of that report.
How disturbing! And the fact that Hanford and New Orleans is just despicable. That Hanford site I had read about years ago. I wonder how much the Columbia River is now polluted downstream because of Hanford upstream? If only we would invest in economically viable ways of producing wind and solar energy. Actually, the technology exists I believe, but we need economies of scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. My God that poor kid! As if having deformities isn't enough, she's also
an orphan. Way to go humankind! And it's really awful the US managed to keep the pollution they made confined to another country far away. Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It was horrible.
The child's body has been destroyed. The tumors below the child's waist I am sure have rendered most movements impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. For those too lazy to read the article - it is a Chernobyl victim

Image: JULIEN BEHAL/CHERNOBYL'S CHILDREN PROJECT
RADIOACTIVE LEGACY: The orphan Sasha suffers from the health legacy of the explosion at the nuclear power plant in Chernobyl.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, that is what it says. I was commenting on two things in the article
that struck me, and was typing fast so I didn't separate with paragraphs. Sorry for the confusion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC