This doodling was prompted by a post on
The Oil Drum.
That poster observed that every year we grow only 2 gigatonnes of grain but use 4 gigatonnes of oil. Given that grain carry-forward reserves are declining (to only 53 days' supply this year) and that we've eaten more grain than we've grown in 7 of the last 8 years, it's instantly obvious that every liter of crop-sourced biofuel that goes into a fuel tank comes directly out of someone's stomach. Ultimately it comes out of a poor brown someone's stomach.
Once I stopped retching, I wondered how much net biofuel that 2GT of grain would actually produce. Well, I know from previous research that the ethanol yield from grain averages around 400 liters per tonne. Correcting for the density of ethanol (0.789 kg/liter) we get about 0.32 tonnes of ethanol per tonne of grain. So we can produce a total of 631 million tonnes of ethanol.
Now, assuming all the process energy for the ethanol production comes from that same fuel stream (i.e. we use up some of the ethanol to make the portion we end up using), and assuming that the EROEI of crop ethanol is 1.3:1, the net ethanol production is (631,000,000*(1.3/2.3)) = 357 million tonnes of ethanol. In order to compare this to oil you need to factor in the lower energy content of ethanol, which is about 2/3 that of oil. So our net ethanol gives us 357*.66 =
235 million tonnes of oil equivalent.
Every year we use
4 billion tonnes of oil. If we turned
all the world's grain into ethanol we would end up with
9% of that.
Do we really think that just because the corn shipped to an American ethanol plant was grown in Iowa, that it didn't come indirectly out of the diet of someone in a poor developing country?