Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IPCC Update - "It's Now The Choice Between A Damaged World, Or A More Damaged World"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:20 PM
Original message
IPCC Update - "It's Now The Choice Between A Damaged World, Or A More Damaged World"
A crippling tropical disease spread by mosquitoes has taken a foothold in Europe and could be heading for Britain, climate change scientists have warned. In the last few weeks, more than 200 people in northern Italy have been infected with chikungunya - a disease that causes crippling muscle pain and fever. One died.

Health officials say it is the first time an outbreak of the disease has been confirmed outside the tropics. There are fears that a succession of warm summers and mild winters could allow it to spread to Switzerland, France and the UK.

The warning came as United Nations scientists predicted rising world temperatures would bring more exotic diseases to Europe. A 980-page report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, launched yesterday in London, forecast more deaths from heatwaves, an increase in skin cancer and higher pollen counts.

EDIT

Professor Martin Parry, a British co-author, said a rise in world temperaturesof 2C, the maximum target-set by the European Union, was almost inevitable. The report says this temperature rise would cause water shortages for two billion, put a fifth of the world's species at risk of extinction, damage almost all the world's coral reefs and put an extra three million men and women at risk of flooding. "A 2C increase will be difficult to avoid," he said. "It's now the choice between a damaged world - or a more damaged world."

EDIT

Dry spell: Lake Chad photographed in 1972 (left) and in 1987


Rising waters: China's Yellow River in 1979 (left) and in 2000


Sea of change: The Aral Sea in 1973 (left) and 2004


http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23412755-details/The+deadly+disease+bound+for+Britain+on+the+warming+wind/article.do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. *sigh*
And I still talk to British people who say that "not all scientists agree" that it's man made... so why worry about doing anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think "profoundly damaged" and "completely totaled" are also on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. dont forget
"major planetary extinction event"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unfortunately, this seems to be the most likely event
Hell, I am pretty sure I have read and seen on more than one occasion that our species extinction rate is the highest since the Cretaceous Era...ALREADY.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020109074801.htm

Ahhhh...the power of calculus.

Could the dinosaurs have tracked their yearly decline in the years after the comet? Could they have made pretty powerpoint presentations showing, "If dieoffs continue to increase in rate, and global mean temperature falls more than 2.0 degrees C or even if the rate of cooling speeds up, then it is possible that we could be facing a major planetary extinction even."

I think not. Now THAT'S progress.

I wonder what will next fill the major niche(s) after the mammals? Insecta, maybe? Who knows. Biology is unpredictable. I would say it's an even toss that the mammals are displaced as the dominant evolutionary niche within a million years, possibly 100,000, and an outside shot at 10,000 years, though I suspect it will take longer.

That's what the dinosaurs would've thought, too, if they could think about it, so only time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC