Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bringing Remote Renewable Energy to Market

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 07:12 PM
Original message
Bringing Remote Renewable Energy to Market
http://www.renewableaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=49991

Although California is blessed with some of the best geothermal, wind and solar resources in the U.S. -- as well as the policies and legislation in place to do take advantage of those resources -- a number of the renewable energy-rich areas are too far from the electric transmission grid to render them useful.

In an attempt to alleviate this dilemma, California has formed a public-private partnership called the Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI) to consider the feasibility of building new transmission lines to access renewable generation. The goal is to bring renewable electricity to the grid as it is generated from isolated areas of the state or possibly adjoining states.

"We've made tremendous progress developing the transmission plan to bring electricity from the wind-rich Tehachapi Mountain area to Southern California customers," explained California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Commissioner Dian M. Grueneich. "Our goal with RETI is to identify the next Tehachapi."

RETI is designed to rapidly develop renewable energy to meet the state's mandate of producing 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2010 and goal of 33 percent by 2020. The CPUC, the California Energy Commission, the California Independent System Operator (California ISO) and representatives of publicly owned utilities, including Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and the Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA), are spearheading the initiative.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. AO!
Acronym Overload!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't worry, the CEQA/NEPA process takes so long
we won't see a DEIR/DEIS for decades. Not to mention the AFC process. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razzleberry Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. greenwash .n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-19-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Um, well, gee, um, you see, uhhh...
Edited on Wed Sep-19-07 09:38 PM by NNadir
California's renewable energy share has been falling, not rising, at least for electricity:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/st_profiles/sept04ca.xls

Of course, what one actually does is not as important as what one promises.

This is why 10% of the vehicles sold in 2003 in California, as mandated by the 1990 ZEV law, are ZEV vehicles.

Now I'm going to hear some idiotic remark made about how the percentage of nuclear electricity in California has fallen too. The remark will be made no doubt by the people who have done everything in their power to prevent nuclear power from doing what it can do, not that any of these people have the moral or intellectual integrity to consider whether their prophecies are self-fulfilling or not.

Actually, the shit-for-brains Walmart executive Amory Lovins was actively predicting the demise of nuclear power in California and everywhere else on earth back in 1980.

(See Lovins, SFB, whoops I mean Amory, Foreign Affairs Fall 1980, 1137-1176, "Nuclear Power and Nuclear Bombs"

Apparently we're all still waiting, even in Benton, AR, for this to happen, for nuclear power to disappear because it's "not economic." We are all going to drive our hydrogen hypercar SUV's - which are clearly "economic" down to our local wind farm to celebrate the demise of nuclear power.

It's disappeared:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table27.xls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC