Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Peak Oil: Fact or Fiction?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:10 PM
Original message
Peak Oil: Fact or Fiction?
I'm all for the greening of the planet,absolutely, without a doubt!...but I DO wonder why most of us have never heard of this! Why is this never discussed?

The U.S. Govt's Secret
Colorado Oil Discovery

THE GREEN RIVER FORMATION

Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world — more than 2 TRILLION barrels.

When the oil is extracted, “America would become the world’s single biggest oil source, far exceeding Saudi Arabia’s proven reserves of 261 billion barrels,” reports the Wall Street Journal.

The U.S. Energy Department announces the results of a land survey...

It was conducted to determine the official amount of oil a thousand feet deep in the Rocky Mountains...

They reported this stunning news:

We have more oil inside our borders, than all the other proven reserves on earth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here are the official estimates:

• 8-times as much oil as Saudi Arabia
• 18-times as much oil as Iraq
• 21-times as much oil as Kuwait
• 22-times as much oil as Iran
• 500-times as much oil as Yemen

...And it's all right here in the Western United States.

James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says, "We've got more oil in this very compact area than the entire Middle East."

More than 2 TRILLION barrels. Untapped.

"That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in the world today," reports The Denver Post.

When asked about America's least-publicized oil supply, Utah Senator Orrin Hatch said:

"The amounts of oil are staggering. Who would have guessed that in just Colorado and Utah, there is more recoverable oil than in the Middle East?"

Here's the kicker...

The U.S. government already owns the land. It's been right there under our noses the whole time.

In fact, the government's appointed a small group of companies to lead the way to the oil.

Test drilling has already begun.


Today, this resource sits idle — untapped — inside more than 16,000 square miles of rock and sand.

Geologists call what lies in this region, oil shale.

What is oil shale?


At first glance, oil shale looks like an ordinary black rock.

It feels grainy to the touch and... greasy. You see, what's inside oil shale has huge governments, Big Oil, venture capitalists, and even everyday investors scrambling to stake a claim.

Oil shale — when heated — oozes bubbling crude.

This precious resource is rare — found only in a few select countries. Places like China, Brazil, Estonia, Morocco, and Australia.


But the real story is how much untapped oil shale lies beneath U.S. soil. As the chart to the right indicates, there's 4-times more oil shale in the U.S. than in all other countries combined.

Over the past 125 years, oil shale has been the secret oil source for a handful of nations. Specifically, those fortunate enough to have it...




• China's been using oil shale since 1929. Today, China is the largest producer of oil from oil shale. It plans to double the daily rate of production soon.
• Estonia is an oil shale dependent economy. Over 90% of the country's electricity is fueled by shale oil. In fact, electricity run on oil shale is a chief export.
• In 1991, Brazil built the world's largest oil shale facility. They've already produced more than 1.5 MILLION tons of oil to make high quality transportation fuels.
• Jordan, Morocco, and Australia have recently announced plans to utilize their oil shale resources. All 3 governments are currently working to build oil shale facilities.

But all these countries' oil shale resources pale in comparison to the U.S. supply. As you can see from the table to the right, the United States dominates the oil shale market — with over 72% of the world's oil shale resources.

Our gargantuan supply of oil lies beneath an area called the Green River Formation — a barren stretch of land covering portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.

World-renowned geologist Walter Youngquist calls the oil beneath the Green River Formation, "a national treasure."

Congress calls this area simply, "the next Saudi Arabia."

It's easy to see why...

This region holds the largest known oil reserve on the planet...

Colorado's Oil Lands —
Restricted for 76 Years, Now
Open for Drilling

There are over 16,000 square miles of oil shale in the Green River formation...

The most abundant areas hold up to 2 million barrels of oil per acre — it's the most concentrated energy source on earth, according to the Energy Department.

The federal government owns 80% of this oil-rich land.

In fact, the government placed protective legislation on this land in 1930, forbidding anyone to touch it.


You see, the government always knew this land was saturated with oil — but getting it out has always been expensive.

Buying oil from foreign countries was always the cheaper bet. It has been for the past 80 years.

Wisely, the government kept the land around for a "rainy day," protecting it with 1930s legislation.

I'm sure you're aware of today's situation at the gas pump. Buying oil from foreign countries has gotten out of hand. The price of oil is sky-high. It's way too expensive to keep buying foreign oil.

In other words, the "rainy day" has finally arrived.

The timing couldn't be more perfect. Oil shale technologies have begun to advance – drastically.

Companies are coming up with ways to extract oil from the Green River Formation very cheaply.

For example, one Utah-based company says it can extract the oil for as little as $10 a barrel. In fact, dozens of companies have stepped forward with similar claims. With oil prices starting to skyrocket again – these are pretty significant breakthroughs.

That's all the government needed to hear. On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed into law a new energy mandate.

This mandate is called The Energy Policy Act of 2005. It calls for the opening phases of oil extraction in the Green River Formation – the world's most concentrated energy source.

We're finally ready to tap the largest oil reserve on the planet...

"The United States Could become
‘The New Middle East'"

- U.S. Energy Department Survey


There's so much oil in this region the Energy Dept. thinks we could become the world's leading oil producer.

This reserve is so big it's projected to last for 500 years, according to some estimates.

You could even add together all the oil in the Middle East—and our reserves would still come out on top — 3-TIMES LARGER.

That's a lot of oil.



Of the 2 trillion barrels of proven oil in the Green River Formation — between 800 billion and 1.2 trillion barrels are recoverable.



This historic legislation officially opens up the Green River Formation to a handful of drilling companies.

Already, the government has awarded three companies 160 acres of land apiece, to test their oil shale drilling methods for commercial production.

According to the Bureau of Land Management (the department responsible for allocating the land):

"The initial term of the leases is 10 years with the option of extending the leases up to five years with proof of diligent pursuit of commercial production levels. The leases also contain a preferential right to convert the acreage plus adjacent acreage up to 4,960 acres to a 20-year commercial lease once commercial production levels have been achieved and all requirements have been met."

In other words, any company showing they can get the oil out cheaply and safely, could get a 20-year commercial lease on the 2 trillion barrel oil field.

From the three companies chosen, I think only one company's drilling technology will meet the government's strict shale development standards – and go on to develop oil shale on a commercial level.

This company would be responsible for launching America's first commercial oil shale operation and production "...Leading the way to more than two trillion barrels of oil shale deposits in the Green River Formation," writes the U.S. Federal News Service.

-Daily Wealth
Steve Sjuggerud


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Environmental and monetery costs have been too great
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 04:13 PM by Warpy
to consider full scale oil extraction from oil shale thus far.

Peak oil is a fact, in that it refers to easy to extract, easy to refine light crude oil.

Would we decide to get used to $200/bbl oil and a despoiled western wilderness, perhaps it could be considered in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. pssssst...
You know that shale oil is not really oil don't ya???? SO to answer your question, peak oil is real and happening now... Shale oil is not going to save this sorry planet..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I always wonder why they
say oil reserves are basically only found in the mideast. That's what I'm referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's more energy in a cubic foot of Cap'n Crunch than a cubic foot of kerogen shales
And to fully exploit the Green River formation would require duplicating the entire generating capacity of the state of Colorado.

BTW, it was a guy from Shell who gave the presentation at which item #2 came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WizardTN Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sources please
For example, one Utah-based company says it can extract the oil for as little as $10 a barrel. In fact, dozens of companies have stepped forward with similar claims.


Can you provide sources for this ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Here ya go:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WizardTN Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. note this
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 05:06 PM by WizardTN
The development of a commercial oil shale industry in the United States would also have significant social and economic impacts on local communities. Other impediments to development of the oil shale industry in the United States include the relatively high cost of producing oil from oil shale (currently greater than $60 per barrel), and the lack of regulations to lease oil shale.

from:
http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm


also:
Development at a Measured Pace. Many uncertainties regarding technology
performance and environmental and socioeconomic impacts remain unresolved.
While the above “early action” recommendations will serve to narrow uncertainties
and reduce the risks of making poor decisions, resolution of the most critical issues
associated with strategically significant levels of production will not occur until the
initial round of large-scale commercial facilities are constructed and operated—
a point that is at least 12 years down the road. A particularly pressing issue is the
viability of in-situ retorting because this approach may offer a more profitable and far
more environmentally benign alternative to mining and surface retorting. The prevailing
information shortfalls suggest that oil shale development should proceed at a
measured pace.

read the RAND summary here:

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2005/RAND_MG414.sum.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shale is difficult to process
I saw an article where the Israelis were working with the Jordanians in developing this process to tap into the shale that is in the Jordanian mountains that they share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. All we have to do is move the Rockies.
Sounds like a plan. Where shall we put them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WizardTN Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. These guys may object
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 05:12 PM by WizardTN
The Colorado School of Mines (CSM), along with the Colorado Energy Research Institute (CERI), will host the 27th Oil Shale Symposium at the Green Center on the Colorado School of Mines Campus.

The Symposium will review development of oil shale resources worldwide, including research & development, impact analysis, regulatory framework, and project & program status.

The Symposium will consist of a broad overview session on Monday afternoon (October 15th), two days of technical sessions in many different program areas (see list) on Tuesday and Wednesday (October 16-17), and an optional field trip Thursday and Friday (October 18-19). The deadline for submission of abstracts will be June 29, 2007.


------------

might spoil the field trip

LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. In addition to the reasons already stated, you need water to extract oil shales
Edited on Tue Oct-02-07 09:39 PM by NickB79
And I mean LOTS of water. The Alberta tar sands, which are actually easier to extract than oil shales, are consuming entire rivers and turning the areas around the tar sands mining operations into moonscapes dotted with toxic lakes.

Now imagine operations like that, only expanded ten-fold, in the American Southwest. Note that the Southwest is currently experiencing a prolonged drought (likely due to global warming) that will probably only get worse. The booming population in the area is already taxing the water resources of the area, and finding billions of gallons of water to mine oil shales is completely unrealistic unless we evacuate the populations of Phoenix, Las Vegas, Reno, Los Angeles to conserve water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Shale oil is destructive to the environment to extract,
and very expensive to refine. It should be left where it is as we move on to better technologies. We don't need to destroy our last wild places to get more of the medicine that is already making us sick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's a stupid and destructive way of turning natural gas and coal into a crappy oil substitute.
When we're struggling for natural gas supplies, and the price increases of heavy industrial equipment are exceeding inflation, then nobody is going to look twice at this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC