Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Volvo has announced that it will stop buying nuclear power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 05:03 PM
Original message
Volvo has announced that it will stop buying nuclear power
http://www.thelocal.se/8770/

Volvo in nuclear energy retreat

Published: 12th October 2007 14:15 CET

Truck maker Volvo has announced that it will cease buying Swedish nuclear power at the end of this year. Volvo has signed a deal with Vattenfall ensuring that it does not receive energy from nuclear power sources, which it said did not sit well with the company's environmental goals.

"We place nuclear energy far down the scale. It's not sustainable from a number of aspects," Volvo's environmental chief Inge Horkeby told Dagens Nyheter.

"The raw materials used to produce nuclear energy are a finite resource and the waste management problem has not been solved," she added.

<snip>

Volvo has the stated aim of fuelling all its plants worldwide using renewable energy sources. The company has already built three farms at its Belgian plant in Gent, with a further wind farm in the pipeline for the Tuve plant outside Gothenburg.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. On a technical level, I don't agree with Volvo's environmental chief . . .
And when compared to fossil fuels, it's quite attractive.

But it doesn't matter what I or Volvo think. New nukes are going to happen, because for all its faults, nuclear power beats cheap coal plants six ways from Sunday, and oil and natural gas are becoming too expensive to be "sustainable" (not to mention that planet-killing stuff). True, carbon sequestration and IGCC technologies can make coal less calamitous to use, but not nearly good enough.

The Beijing Olympics are going to be an absolute disaster because pollution will negatively impact most events -- and a substantial part of the pollution is from cheap coal plants, which the Chinese are churning out at a terrifying rate.

Right, wrong, or indifferent, get ready for a future of new nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have a question about the logistics of agreements like this.
How do you "ensure" that you aren't receiving electrons from a nuclear power plant? I mean, the reactors are still running, pumping amps into the grid. And I assume Volvo is attached to that same grid. At any given time, they're drawing amps from whoever is producing them. Whether they like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You can't.
There's no way to draw only power from certain sources through the grid. However, you can pretend like you were only getting power from such and such source by working out what the cost would be for that power, then paying that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-12-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh really? How many electron sorters is the CAR company going to hire?
Edited on Fri Oct-12-07 07:31 PM by NNadir
Let me guess: They're going to hire Amory Lovins to sort electrons.

They're a car company. As a CAR company, they are owned lock stock and barrel by dangerous fossil fuel companies, just like the rest of the paid off anti-nuke industry.

There aren't enough trees in Sweden to burn for gasoline, there aren't enough fields to drench with nitrogen to fuel Volvo.

Meanwhile, over at KTH, their teaching advanced courses in advanced nuclear fuel cycle management.

By the way, what happened to the stupid anti-nuke Swedish phase-out of nuclear power. What happened, did the Danes get scared of having to turn the lights off?

Oh, and what about the Forsmark "Chernobyl" that stupid anti-nukes were hawking about a year ago.

Into the memory hole?

Did it fall down a Russian gas well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC