Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ethanol booms threatens West's water supply

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:18 AM
Original message
Ethanol booms threatens West's water supply
Ethanol is supposed to be good for the environment. But producing green fuel can cost a lot of water.

By Jim Moscou | Newsweek Web Exclusive
Feb 21, 2008 | Updated: 10:08 a.m. ET Feb 21, 2008

Mike Adamson remembers when water wasn't such a problem. As a kid growing up on his family's cattle feedlot along the Colorado-Kansas border, "you could dig a post hole and see water runnin' in the bottom," he recalls. Today, Adamson is 48 and in charge of the family business, Adamson Brothers and Sons Feedlot, a holding ranch for cattle as they go to market. And the water, he says, is disappearing. "The lakes are gone. The wetlands are gone." In fact, Adamson adds, entire stretches of the nearby Republican River are gone.

In the arid regions of the American West, water has always been a precious, liquid gold. But in Adamson's home of Yuma County, two hours east of Denver, the stakes just got higher. Thanks to the boom in ethanol production spurred by green-energy concerns, corn farmers in Yuma County--one of the top three corn-producing counties in the country--are enjoying a new prosperity.

But the green-fuel boom touted as a clean, eco-friendly alternative to gasoline is proving to have its own dirty costs. Growing corn demands lots of water, and, in Eastern Colorado, this means intensive irrigation from an already stressed water table, the great Ogallala aquifer. One sign of trouble: in just the past two decades, farmers tapping into the local aquifers have helped to shorten the North Fork of the Republican River, which starts in Yuma County, by 10 miles. The ethanol boom will only hasten the drop further, say scientist and engineers studying the aquifers. The region's water shortage has pitted water-hungry farmers against one another. And lurking in the cornrows: lawsuits and interstate water squabbles could shut down Eastern Colorado's estimated $500 million annual ethanol bonanza with the swing of a judge's gavel. Collectively, " is clearly not sustainable," says Jerald Schnoor, a professor of engineering at the University of Iowa and cochairman of an October 2007 National Research Council study for Congress that was critical of ethanol. "Production will have serious impacts in water-stressed regions." And in Eastern Colorado, there's lots of water stress.

Still, with so much money growing in the fields, the current problems haven't stopped anyone on Colorado's plains. "Finally, here's the alternative market that farmers have been working toward for decades," said Mark Sponsler, executive director of the Colorado Corn Growers Association. The state's farmers planted a near record acreage of corn in 2007, up nearly 20 percent from the year before. It's not hard to see why. After hovering around $2 a bushel for nearly 50 years, corn is trading at about $4.50 today. Meanwhile, the Bush administration has called for ethanol to displace 15 percent of the nation's gasoline supply by 2015, double that by 2030. And Yuma is preparing. The state's two ethanol plants have been built nearby in just the past few years, with a third on the way. "It sure is a good time," says Byron Weathers, a farmer with 2,500 acres of corn. "It's definitely been a big plus for our state. The whole nation, really."


http://www.newsweek.com/id/114364
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. The west has been under a drought as long as I can remember.
It's just plain silly to think you can have enough water out there for ethanol production. We need drinking water more than we need gas and water for food crops so we can eat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. The famous "Law of Unintended Consequences" strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I heard a report that Lake Mead may dry up by 2021. Our great lake states are entering into a
compact that protects water from being siphoned out of the Great Lakes watershed.

Yes, water is indeed becoming a big issue and ethanol a big diaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. I guess states could simply do what Georgia is now attempting
Just sneak your border towards the nearest free-flowing water source. Voila! Problem solved.

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/02/06/tenn_0206.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ethanol is a boon for the oil and gas business
One acre of land yields 60 gallons of fuel after you count all the fossil fuel products used to produce those 60 gallons. That is not going to provide us sufficient alternative fuel even if we didn't have Hummers to deal with (and the accompanying small, ah, self-esteem).

We are going off in a dopey direction again with ethanol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. The price of the wheat is going through the roof.
Perhaps some corn farmers will turn to a more sensible crop for the area. Wheat uses much less water than corn, and much less nitrogen fertilizer, too.

Of course, using the high plains as grazing land makes the more sense. With the price of corn up, perhaps we'll be seeing less corn-fed and more grass-fed beef.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC