and has actually wasted vast amounts of energy on servers used to promote the solar faith.
In fact, what the solar faith has NOT had the courage or guts to do is to
back up their words with even a fucking hint of reality.
Solar is a
trivial form of energy and all the could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, could, talk in the world will not make solar electricity anything but the
trivial form of energy that it has been through 50 years of such talk.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/solar.renewables/page/trends/table1.htmlIn the meantime, we have indifferent yuppie brats telling we can have our cars at the same time we have a shred of ethics.
Bullshit. Denial at this point, which is paid for in the lung tissue of the innocent and the guilty alike is a
lieIf the smug yuppie solar faith had a leg to stand on, it would have produced
significant energy 30 years ago when the liar Amory Lovins - a scientific, moral, and economic fraud - starting bashing nuclear energy because of the "arriving solar dawn.
I quote the asshole in 1976:
Recent research suggests that a largely or wholly solar economy can be constructed in the United States with straightforward soft technologies that are now demonstrated and now economic or nearly economic." Such a conceptual exercise does not require "exotic" methods such as sea-thermal, hot-dry-rock geothermal, cheap (perhaps organic) photovoltaic, or soIar-thcrmal electric systems. If developed, as some probably will be, these technologies could be convenient, but they are in no way essential for an industrial society operating solely on energy income.
Figure 2 shows a plausible and realistic growth pattern...
(Amory Lovins, "The Path Not Taken," Foreign Affairs, Summer 1976, page 83.
Note the use, in 1976 on the part of
fraud "recent," and "plausible" and "now demonstrated."
Every fucking word was a
lie.
Now if Amory Lovins was lying in 1976, distorting reality, constructing elaborate insupportable sand castles is there any reason, any reason whatsoever that any reasonable person would believe the same crap 30 years later?
If it were doable, it would have been done.
Any talk about the future - particularly from those who have
destroyed the future - is not merely contemptible. It is beyond contemptible. It is at the ethical level of religious vandalism of any period of history where ignorance triumphed at the expense of ethical polity.
Now. Maybe the anti-nuke sun worshipping cult thinks that people are dumb, that they have no memories, that reason and knowledge can be waved off with prayer and incantations.
Bullshit. Numbers do not lie. The Pope did
not change the motions of the planets when he banned Galileo. On the contrary, he condemned himself and all of his ilk for all of history.
But let's come to more modern times. After presenting this lie, the fraud Amory Lovins went on to try to destroy what was then and is now the world's largest source of climate change gas free energy - the
only form of energy that is capable of confining the bulk of its risk on plant grounds - nuclear energy. Why? Because he despised insight, despised balanced thinking, despised everything other than his own self-aggrandizement and material reward. He proved to be nothing more than a lazy, smirking, morally indifferent, self apologetic consumer, that's why. You can always make more money with bibles than you can with science.
(Later this fucking immoral and amoral fool went on claim he would put hydrogen hypercars on the road by 2005
and fucking fellow frauds posted his (unreferenced and undemonstrated) and now he makes money greenwashing dangerous fossil fuel companies, mining companies and oh yes, the Pentagon.)
Now we have the
same lie repeated as if it were not to questioned, or better yet, not to be regarded with profound moral disgust.
There is NOT ONE "solar will save us" advocate who has the guts, integrity or quality of mind to confess that all that their crap is nothing more than wishful thinking and denial. There is NOT ONE "solar will save us" advocate who will commit to shut his or her mouth until the first exajoule of solar electricity is produced in a single year - just one out of the 500 exajoules humanity now consumes.
NOT ONE.