Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USDA - American Soybean Stocks Will Fall To Less Than 3-Week Supply Before 2008 Harvest - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:31 PM
Original message
USDA - American Soybean Stocks Will Fall To Less Than 3-Week Supply Before 2008 Harvest - Reuters
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 12:31 PM by hatrack
WASHINGTON - The US soybean stockpile will shrink to less than a three-week supply before this fall's harvest, and voracious demand around the world is also thinning US wheat supply, the government said on Tuesday.

Grain and soy futures prices rose on the Chicago Board of Trade after the US Department of Agriculture released the crop report. Corn, wheat and soybeans are forecast to sell for record-high prices at the farm gate this marketing year.

USDA projected a soybean stockpile of 140 million bushels, (3.8 million tonnes), which would be the smallest season-ending figure in four years for the versatile oilseed used for food and livestock feed. The USDA raised its forecast for soybean exports by 20 million bushels to 1.025 billion bushels, "reflecting strong sales, especially to China," for the current marketing year. It pegged wheat exports at 1.225 billion bushels, up 25 million bushels.

The wheat carry-out, estimated at 242 million bushels (6.6 million tonnes), would be the smallest in six decades, USDA said. Chicago traders had expected a soy figure of 153 million bushels and wheat at 263 million bushels.

EDIT

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/47458/story.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Phase change when reserves drop to zero. 2009?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unless things happen "faster than expected"
But that could NEVER happen, 'cuz we're 'Muricans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. And yet growing hemp is still illegal.
Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. For the last four years I've been tracking Peak Oil and Climate Change
And now it turns out the big hammers will be food security and the financial system. I wish the world would just settle on one pair of catastrophes and leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. One could argue that the food insecurity and economic problems
are in large part due to the unaddressed problems of PO and CC/GW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think the economic meltdown is a standalone
The way I see it, the econoclysm is a purely human problem brought on by human institutions, though I'd be willing to consider evidence to the contrary. I think its main influence will be in the the other direction, it will prevent us from coping with PO/CC/food problems because of lack of capital.

Food, PO and CC are definitely linked. I was aware of the linkage before, but I misunderestimated the faster-than-expectedness of CC and how powerful the impact would be on crop yields. I was waiting for my bungalow in Ottawa to have an ocean beach, and didn't figure out the real significance of rainfall shifts until just the last few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Would either Clinton or Obama restrict exports?
I can't seem to find anything on this subject.

McCain's advisors would risk food riots, I'm sure.

And no one would dare risk eliminating ethanol subsidies. The corn belt states are just too important to control of the Senate and include Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa, all swing states from time to time.

Maybe its time to plant some potatoes and yams, and buy marginal farmland in the northeast for potato production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. But, there will be enough for ethanol and biodiesel, right?
We have to keep our priorities straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC